Cross-border spatial accessibility of health care in the North-East Department of Haiti

Abstract

BackgroundThe geographical accessibility of health services is an important issue especially in developing countries and even more for those sharing a border as for Haiti and the Dominican Republic. During the last 2 decades, numerous studies have explored the potential spatial access to health services within a whole country or metropolitan area. However, the impacts of the border on the access to health resources between two countries have been less explored. The aim of this paper is to measure the impact of the border on the accessibility to health services for Haitian people living close to the Haitian-Dominican border.MethodsTo do this, the widely employed enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method is applied. Four scenarios simulate different levels of openness of the border. Statistical analysis are conducted to assess the differences and variation in the E2SFCA results. A linear regression model is also used to predict the accessibility to health care services according to the mentioned scenarios.ResultsThe results show that the health professional-to-population accessibility ratio is higher for the Haitian side when the border is open than when it is closed, suggesting an important border impact on Haitians’ access to health care resources. On the other hand, when the border is closed, the potential accessibility for health services is higher for the Dominicans.ConclusionThe openness of the border has a great impact on the spatial accessibility to health care for the population living next to the border and those living nearby a road network in good conditions. Those findings therefore point to the need for effective and efficient trans-border cooperation between health authorities and health facilities. Future research is necessary to explore the determinants of cross-border health care and offers an insight on the spatial revealed access which could lead to a better understanding of the patients’ behavior.

Equity in Stochastic Healthcare Facility Location

“…Some other studies account for factors such as spatial accessibility, multi-modal travel, temporal service availability, competition, multiple and hierarchical services, socio-economic and personal factors, etc. in order to more realistically reproduce users' behaviors (Bruno et al, 2020;Higgs et al, 2019;Jin et al, 2019;Mathon et al, 2018;Mayaud et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2018;Shin and Lee, 2018;Yin et al, 2018).…”

Travel time to health facilities in areas of outbreak potential: maps for guiding local preparedness and response

“…While global assessments of healthcare access and quality have been developed [22], implementing these principles at a local level, for multiple countries simultaneously, has not been addressed. Furthermore, the quantified travel times are not always the actual traveled route to care, as persons may pursue alternative paths to access a health facility, including cross-border travel [58], or chose an alternate facility aside from the closest facility [59, 60], particularly during emergencies [61]. In some instances, while a facility may be available, individuals could already be too ill to travel and are treated at home, or seek non-facility-based forms of healthcare provisioning such as traditional healers [62].…”

Measuring spatiotemporal accessibility for pediatric clinical services with multimodal transport modes: an exploratory analysis in Nanjing, China

“…In the accessibility business field, the accessibility of healthcare is a multifaceted field that involves primary healthcare (Tanser, Gijsbertsen, & Herbst, 2006), access to healthcare in rural areas (Schoeps, Gabrysch, Niamba, Sié, & Becher, 2011) (Kanuganti, Sarkar, & Singh, 2016), the cross-border spatial accessibility of health care (Mathon, Apparicio, & Lachapelle, 2018), the spatial equity of multilevel healthcare (S. Zhang, Song, Wei, & Deng, 2019), hospital care and emergency medical services (Wenyan Hu et al, 2018;T. Xia et al, 2019), and mental health in childhood and adolescence (Nordbø, Nordh, Raanaas, & Aamodt, 2018).…”