Travel time to health facilities in areas of outbreak potential: maps for guiding local preparedness and response

Abstract

BackgroundRepeated outbreaks of emerging pathogens underscore the need for preparedness plans to prevent, detect, and respond. As countries develop and improve National Action Plans for Health Security, addressing subnational variation in preparedness is increasingly important. One facet of preparedness and mitigating disease transmission is health facility accessibility, linking infected persons with health systems and vice versa. Where potential patients can access care, local facilities must ensure they can appropriately diagnose, treat, and contain disease spread to prevent secondary transmission; where patients cannot readily access facilities, alternate plans must be developed. Here, we use travel time to link facilities and populations at risk of viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) and identify spatial variation in these respective preparedness demands.Methods and findingsWe used geospatial resources of travel friction, pathogen environmental suitability, and health facilities to determine facility accessibility of any at-risk location within a country. We considered in-country and cross-border movements of exposed populations and highlighted vulnerable populations where current facilities are inaccessible and new infrastructure would reduce travel times. We developed profiles for 43 African countries. Resulting maps demonstrate gaps in health facility accessibility and highlight facilities closest to areas at risk for VHF spillover. For instance, in the Central African Republic, we identified travel times of over 24 h to access a health facility. Some countries had more uniformly short travel times, such as Nigeria, although regional disparities exist. For some populations, including many in Botswana, access to areas at risk for VHF nationally was low but proximity to suitable spillover areas in bordering countries was high. Additional analyses provide insights for considering future resource allocation. We provide a contemporary use case for these analyses for the ongoing Ebola outbreak.ConclusionsThese maps demonstrate the use of geospatial analytics for subnational preparedness, identifying facilities close to at-risk populations for prioritizing readiness to detect, treat, and respond to cases and highlighting where gaps in health facility accessibility exist. We identified cross-border threats for VHF exposure and demonstrate an opportunity to improve preparedness activities through the use of precision public health methods and data-driven insights for resource allocation as part of a country’s preparedness plans.

A Risk Assessment Tool for Resumption of Research Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…In developing our risk assessment tool, we drew on a combination of expert consultations, national and local expertise, institutional guidance and review of emerging literature. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] We convened a multinational panel of scientists and eld team leaders from across the trial with expertise in the disciplines of clinical medicine and imaging, nursing, environmental science, epidemiology, behavioral science, community engagement and statistics, along with the trial funders who provide scienti c guidance to the HAPIN trial. We sought input from local community leaders, the Ministries of Health, universities and nongovernmental organizations regarding appropriate operations and safety concerns.…”

Increased travel times to United States SARS-CoV-2 testing sites: a spatial modeling study

“…vehicle). The shortest path to testing sites was calculated using the Dijkstra algorithm 10 . Median travel times across all grid cells in each of the 3,108 counties were calculated.…”

Travel Time to Health Facilities as a Marker of Geographical Accessibility Across Heterogeneous Land Coverage in Peru

“…This approach may be favorable since traditionally government reports aggregate data at administrative units, in a way that obscures the prioritization of resources. A recent study used a precision public health approach to estimate the geographical accessibility to major cities (22), and recently for estimating the geographical accessibility to health facilities in developing countries (23).…”