1999
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.1999.9706262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-antigenicity Between Ruminal and Hepatic Paramphistomes and Liver Flukes of Buffalo Origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of diagnosis of animals infected with paramphistomes is more by detecting the circulating antibodies in the sera samples of infected animals as compared to the functional/structural antigen of the parasite by ELISA (Maji et al 1999). However, the success of the diagnostic test depending upon the antibody detection depends heavily on identification of suitable antigen specific for paramphistomosis, because the efficacy of immunodiagnostic test is hampered by the possession of common antigenic epitopes by various helminths, thus leading to lack of specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of diagnosis of animals infected with paramphistomes is more by detecting the circulating antibodies in the sera samples of infected animals as compared to the functional/structural antigen of the parasite by ELISA (Maji et al 1999). However, the success of the diagnostic test depending upon the antibody detection depends heavily on identification of suitable antigen specific for paramphistomosis, because the efficacy of immunodiagnostic test is hampered by the possession of common antigenic epitopes by various helminths, thus leading to lack of specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of diagnosis of animals infected with amphistomes is more by detecting the circulating antibodies in the sera samples of infected animals as compared to the functional/structural antigen of the parasite by ELISA [ 13 ]. It is interesting to note that studies on immunodiagnosis of amphistomosis have been mostly based on either adult worm somatic antigen [ 13 – 17 ], excretory/secretory antigen [ 11 , 18 ], or coproantigen [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding immunodiagnosis of amphistomosis limited work has been done utilizing either adult worm somatic antigen [ 13 – 17 ], excretory/secretory antigen [ 11 , 18 ] or coproantigen [ 12 ] as antigen. It is also well known that helminth parasites during the course of development undergo antigenic polymorphism which induces drastic alterations in immune response, so use of these different developmental stage antigens is very important in immunodiagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extra positivity observed in this group might be due to prepatent infection or cross reactivity with other closely related helminths parasites (Maji et al, 1999;Yadav et al, 2003;Salib et al, 2015). The observed specificity of the group PN in the plate-ELISA in the goats was 89.83 (PeSAg) and 91.53% (PeESAg) and in sheep was 89.23 (PeSAg) and 93.85% (PeESAg).…”
Section: Polypeptide Profile Of Antigensmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The variation observed in polypeptide profile, by each worker, could be attributed to the method of antigens preparation. Purification of P. epiclitum functional antigens by specific methods is expected to remove cross reacting components, which if present are liable to cross react and elicit false results in ELISA (Maji et al, 1999;Yadav et al, 2003;Pal and Dasgupta, 2007;Kaur et al, 2013). The phosphoryl-choline epitope is the main element of crossreaction, an important conserved epitope of trematodes (Sloan et al, 1991).…”
Section: Polypeptide Profile Of Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%