Crop yield and grain quality of emmer populations grown in central Italy, as affected by nitrogen fertilization

Marino, Stefano; Tognetti, Roberto; Alvino, A.

doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.08.002

Cited by 36 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nitrogen contents increased due to the increase in the availability of this nutrient in the soil and results agree with those reported in the literature (Kolchinski and Schuch, 2003;Lopez-Bellido et al, 2004;Sepaskhah and Hosseini, 2008;Marino et al, 2009). However, increased N content in the mass of the vegetative and total aerial parts is due to both the increased content and increased mass of the aerial part and grain yield.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Rates of urea with or without urease inhibitor for topdressing wheat

Espindula¹,

Rocha²,

Souza³

et al. 2013

Chilean J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The urease inhibitor NBPT(N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide) is a management alternative to increase urea efficiency in topdressing because it reduces NH3 volatilization. The objective of this study was to evaluate N recovery and yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) 'BRS 254' fertilized with different urea or urea + NBPT rates in topdressing. The experiment was conducted from May to September 2007 in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Treatments followed a 5 × 2 + 1 factorial design consisting of five N fertilizer rates (30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 kg ha -1 ) as urea or urea + NBPT (Agrotain ® ) applied as topdressing and a control without N. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Adding NBPT to urea resulted in better N utilization by wheat plants. The 100 kg N ha -1 topdressing rate provided the best apparent N recovery by wheat plants, whereas 90 kg ha -1 provided the best N use efficiency.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…The reduction in 1000 grain weight and hectoliter mass is similar to the results reported for wheat (Marino et al, 2009). This behavior is mainly due to the compensatory effect between the number of grains and grain mass.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 78%

Rates of urea with or without urease inhibitor for topdressing wheat

Espindula¹,

Rocha²,

Souza³

et al. 2013

Chilean J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In other characteristics, no difference was encountered between the years. Wheat-landraces exist in populations, which increase their adaptability and cause large variation in yield and yield characteristics (Castagna et al, 1995;Sonmez et al, 1999;Marino et al, 2009).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Grain Yield and Some Characteristics of Hulled, Durum and Bread Wheat Genotypes Varieties

Atar

Kara

2017

Turkish JAF Sci.Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In spite of the low grain yield they produce, the hulled wheat have become even more important in recent years because of their resistance to negative environmental conditions and healthy nutritional content. The research was carry out in order to comparison the yield and yield characteristics of durum (Kiziltan-91 and C-1252), hulled (Einkorn and Emmer) and bread wheat (Tir) varieties in Isparta ecological conditions in 2013-14 and 2014-15 vegetation periods. In both years, the highest grain yield was obtained in Kiziltan-91 variety (3992 and 3758 kg ha-1 respectively). The grain yield of hulled wheats in the first year (Einkorn 1269 kg ha-1, Emmer 2125 kg ha-1) was around Turkey averages. However, grain yield decreased of commercial wheat varieties due to the negative effect of high amount of rainfall in June in the second year, but considerably increased in (Einkorn 2150 kg ha-1, Emmer 2533 kg ha-1). N uptake was found to be lower in the than durum wheats. In terms of grain protein content, the highest values were obtained in Emmer variety (16.4%-15.3%).

show abstract

“…In the case of marginal cereal species such as T. monococcum and T. dicoccum, we also used modern varieties as these have generally only been subjected to limited breeding in comparison to the frequently-planted T. aestivum with its many varieties. The TKW of cereals were obtained from the gene bank of the Crop Research Institute Prague -Ruzyně, the database Evigez (plant genetic resources documentation in the Czech Republic, http://genbank.vurv.cz/genetic/resources/asp2/default.htm) -and from the available literature (Codianni et al 1996;Karagöz, Zencirci 2005;Troccoli, Codianni 2005;De Vita et al 2006;Marino et al 2009Marino et al , 2011Pagnotta et al 2009;Ünal 2009;Brandolini et al 2011;Arduiny et al 2014). The TKW for each species was visualized in the form of frequency histograms in order to demonstrate the range of values and their distribution (Figures 2, 3 and 4).…”

Section: Thousand Kernel Weights Of Different Cereals and Recalculatimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The planting of T. monococcum and T. dicoccum has completely disappeared. In the 21 st century, the renaissance of hulled wheat planting (T. monococcum, T. dicoccum and T. spelta) in Europe has been connected with the spread of organic farming and the increased interest in products with a high nutritional quality (Marino et al 2009(Marino et al , 2011Konvalina et al 2012a). Although hulled Hordeum varieties dominate in contemporary Europe, hull-less (naked) varieties have been planted in the past and used for food production (Lister, Jones 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%