1991
DOI: 10.1071/ar9910013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crop growth and relative growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars

Abstract: An analysis of the dynamics of green area index (GAI), dry matter (DM), relative growth rate (RGR) and crop growth rate (CGR) based on growing degree days (GDD) is presented for a historical series of wheats commercially released in Western Australia. Relative to the old cultivars, modern wheats were characterized by a greater RGR during the vegetative phase. This was achieved at a lower initial GAI, which persisted as the season progressed and was associated with a higher CGR at anthesis and greater grain yie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
2
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
25
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slowest increase in RGR under stress was observed for the latest cultivar, i.e. Keyperounda, confirming previous results for wheat [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The slowest increase in RGR under stress was observed for the latest cultivar, i.e. Keyperounda, confirming previous results for wheat [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Haloi and Baldev (1986) observed higher RGR at initial stage of crop growth. Karim and Siddique (1991) stated that higher RGR was obtained at vegetative phase. RGR increased with increasing the number of tiller seedlings hill -1 (Table 3).…”
Section: Relative Growth Rate (Rgr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better understanding of crop yield physiology would help to achieve the rates of yield improvement required in the near future. Various authors have published the results of growth analysis on various crops in terms of different management practices and cultivar comparisons, including maize (e.g., Bullock et al, 1993), wheat (Davidson and Campbell, 1984;Barneix, 1990;Karimi and Siddique, 1991;Ozturk et al, 2006;Neugschwandtner et al, 2015), triticale (Royo and Blanco, 1999), Bermuda grass (Silva et al, 2016), soybean (Clawson et al, 1986;Yusuf et al, 1999;Hu and Wiatrak, 2012), potato (Oliveira et al, 2016), sugar beet (Hoffman and KlugeSeverin, 2011) and peas (Silim et al, 1985;Munier-Jolain et al, 2010;Neugschwandtner et al, 2013). However, few studies appear to have been made on the effect of agronomic treatments on the growth and productivity of wheat at both the individual plant and plant stand levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%