2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crocus sativus L. stigmas and byproducts: Qualitative fingerprint, antioxidant potentials and enzyme inhibitory activities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we assayed O. sipyleum extract activity on isolated rat colon stimulated with LPS, which revealed a useful ex vivo pharmacological model to study the activity of herbal extracts on colon biomarkers playing a key role in oxidative and pro‐inflammatory pathways (Locatelli et al, ; Menghini et al, , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we assayed O. sipyleum extract activity on isolated rat colon stimulated with LPS, which revealed a useful ex vivo pharmacological model to study the activity of herbal extracts on colon biomarkers playing a key role in oxidative and pro‐inflammatory pathways (Locatelli et al, ; Menghini et al, , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we performed a subsequent panel of experiments on isolated rat colon specimens challenged with LPS, a validated ex vivo experimental paradigm to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and extracts on oxidative and inflammatory pathways involved in ulcerative colitis (Locatelli et al, ; Menghini et al, ; Menghini et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated that the extract possessed strong antiradical potential as the quenching effect was 15.37, 35.56, and 54.32% at 500, 1000, and 1500 μg/ml concentrations, respectively ( Figure 2C ). Nevertheless, ABTS radical cation, a widely followed superior antioxidant assay (Menghini et al, 2018), was also used herein and the consequence has been depicted in Figure 2D . As the concentration ranged from 100, 500, to 1000 μg/ml, inhibition effect amplified from 13.19, 43.98, to 65.78%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%