2014
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2014.2369171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criticality of Low-Energy Protons in Single-Event Effects Testing of Highly-Scaled Technologies

Abstract: We report low-energy proton and low-energy alpha particle SEE data on a 32 nm SOI CMOS SRAM that demonstrates the criticality of using low-energy protons for SEE testing of highly-scaled technologies. Low-energy protons produced a significantly higher fraction of multi-bit upsets relative to single-bit upsets when compared to similar alpha particle data. This difference highlights the importance of performing hardness assurance testing with protons that include energy distribution components below 2 MeV. The i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy may further reduce as the proton travels through the BEOL, bringing the proton to enter the SV at an energy close to the Bragg peak (at around 50 keV) where the linear energy transfer (LET) is maximum. Therefore, given that many devices in the 28-90 nm sensitive node size have been shown in the literature [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] to be very sensitive to LEPs, it is possible that they will also be significantly sensitive to thermal neutrons if nitrogen is used in their manufacturing process. Concerning the 14 N target nucleus this turns into a 14 C product nucleus with an energy of just 42 keV, after the neutron capture and proton emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This energy may further reduce as the proton travels through the BEOL, bringing the proton to enter the SV at an energy close to the Bragg peak (at around 50 keV) where the linear energy transfer (LET) is maximum. Therefore, given that many devices in the 28-90 nm sensitive node size have been shown in the literature [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] to be very sensitive to LEPs, it is possible that they will also be significantly sensitive to thermal neutrons if nitrogen is used in their manufacturing process. Concerning the 14 N target nucleus this turns into a 14 C product nucleus with an energy of just 42 keV, after the neutron capture and proton emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, these differences in the travelled paths may lead to protons reaching the active area with LET values that may differ up to 50%. This highlights that care is needed when evaluating SEU from proton direct ionization and predicting the corresponding error rate in space, as already shown in recent papers [3]- [5]. When possible, the physical removal of layers above the sensitive region would be of course the ideal solution [4], but also simulations can greatly help to gain insight into energy loss in the overlayers, if details on the die stack are available.…”
Section: A Trim and Srim Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The threshold LET for heavy-ion induced upsets in CMOS technology is decreasing as the device dimensions are scaled down and bit flips from proton direct ionization have been reported on 65-nm SOI latches and SRAM cells for the first time in 2007 by IBM researchers [1], [2]. Today the effects of low-energy protons are a hot topic: the importance of these particles as a potentially relevant source of errors in space has been recently highlighted [3] and the criticalities of the related testing have been discussed in literature [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D IRECT ionization from low-energy protons (LEP) and related upsets in highly integrated memory devices have been a subject of study for one and a half decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. When the critical charge is low enough (as it is the case for advanced node technologies, < 90 nm [5]), even LEPs can have sufficient linear energy transfer (LET) [0.1-0.5 MeV/(mg/cm 2 )] to cause a bit flip [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%