2020
DOI: 10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.5955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Thinking Profiles of Junior High School Students in Solving Plane Geometry Problems Based on Cognitive Style and Gender

Abstract: This study aimed to describe the students’ critical thinking processes in solving plane geometry problems based on cognitive styles and gender styles. This research used the descriptive qualitative method. The subjects of this study were four junior high school students selected based on differences in cognitive styles and gender styles. The instrument consisted of the main instruments are researchers and supporting instruments, namely problem-solving instruments, cognitive style instruments, and interview gui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar vein, the study of mathematics can help students develop their critical thinking skills (Nurhasanah et al, 2018). In the context of learning mathematics, some examples of activities that can help train critical thinking skills in the classroom include proving, comparing, analyzing, making contradictions, inducing, generalizing, sorting, classifying, evaluating, linking, and creating patterns and problems (Men et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, the study of mathematics can help students develop their critical thinking skills (Nurhasanah et al, 2018). In the context of learning mathematics, some examples of activities that can help train critical thinking skills in the classroom include proving, comparing, analyzing, making contradictions, inducing, generalizing, sorting, classifying, evaluating, linking, and creating patterns and problems (Men et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%