1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1992.00069.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Theory Versus Curriculum Theory: Reconsidering the Dialogue on Dewey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(p. 76, italics in original) Clearly, the reconceptualist exaltation of theory over practice is a far cry from Dewey's commitment to the application of theory and research to the resolution of practical problems in a continuous problem-solving scenario. Hlebowitsh (1992) suggested that recent reconceptualist efforts to embrace Dewey should lead logically to a return to the practical in the curriculum field. Whether Dewey's imperative for practical application can be reconciled with the reconceptualized notion of curriculum theory distanced from curriculum practice remains to be seen.9…”
Section: The Alienation Of Reconceptualized Curriculum Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(p. 76, italics in original) Clearly, the reconceptualist exaltation of theory over practice is a far cry from Dewey's commitment to the application of theory and research to the resolution of practical problems in a continuous problem-solving scenario. Hlebowitsh (1992) suggested that recent reconceptualist efforts to embrace Dewey should lead logically to a return to the practical in the curriculum field. Whether Dewey's imperative for practical application can be reconciled with the reconceptualized notion of curriculum theory distanced from curriculum practice remains to be seen.9…”
Section: The Alienation Of Reconceptualized Curriculum Theorymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While some distance from professional practice certainly is useful to enable focusing on matters otherwise close at hand, the distance that Pinar advocates is unreasonably vast for a professional field. Other scholars have voiced concern over the theorypractice gap promulgated in reconceptualized curriculum theorizing (Ayers, 1992;Hlebowitsh, 1992;Klein, 1992;McCutcheon, 1985).7 The reconceptualist conception of theory-practice is usefully evaluated against Dewey's educational theory, obligations of professional schools to practicing professionals, and the ideal of the land-grant university.8 Academic Elitism, Science, and Dewey's Theory of Curriculum Improvement Throughout their text, Pinar et al (1995) depicted Dewey's thought as largely consistent with, if not foundational to, the reconceptualists (e.g., pp. 131, 570, 593; cf.…”
Section: The Alienation Of Reconceptualized Curriculum Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an especially glaring difficulty when one considers the fact that the articulation of a practical curriculum theory, which was an essential component of Dewey's pragDownloaded by [University of California, San Diego] at 08:04 24 June 2016 matism, is the very evil that critical curriculum theorists have rejected as the contrivance of an instrumental rationality. Such disjunctures cannot be ignored because they reveal a treatment of Dewey (and of the wider curriculum literature) that circumvents Dewey's pragmatism (Hlebowitsh 1992).…”
Section: Dewey and Class Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…John Dewey a été l'un des premiers penseurs critiques en éducation (Hlebowitsh, 1992). L'analyse de l'oeuvre du brésilien Paulo Freire, dont l'influence est évidente chez plusieurs auteurs en éducation relative à l'environnement (particulièrement en Amérique du Sud), permet également de rattacher cette dernière au courant critique.…”
Section: L'éducation Une Science Sociale Critiqueunclassified