“…While some distance from professional practice certainly is useful to enable focusing on matters otherwise close at hand, the distance that Pinar advocates is unreasonably vast for a professional field. Other scholars have voiced concern over the theorypractice gap promulgated in reconceptualized curriculum theorizing (Ayers, 1992;Hlebowitsh, 1992;Klein, 1992;McCutcheon, 1985).7 The reconceptualist conception of theory-practice is usefully evaluated against Dewey's educational theory, obligations of professional schools to practicing professionals, and the ideal of the land-grant university.8 Academic Elitism, Science, and Dewey's Theory of Curriculum Improvement Throughout their text, Pinar et al (1995) depicted Dewey's thought as largely consistent with, if not foundational to, the reconceptualists (e.g., pp. 131, 570, 593; cf.…”