1994
DOI: 10.4135/9781452243696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Theory and Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected a critical theory paradigm to guide the study. A critical theory paradigm allowed us to conceptualize participants’ experiences through social and cultural influences, as well as address issues related to oppression (Hays & Singh, 2012; Morrow & Brown, 1994). This paradigm allowed for data collection and analysis through the lens of the social injustices experienced by the population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected a critical theory paradigm to guide the study. A critical theory paradigm allowed us to conceptualize participants’ experiences through social and cultural influences, as well as address issues related to oppression (Hays & Singh, 2012; Morrow & Brown, 1994). This paradigm allowed for data collection and analysis through the lens of the social injustices experienced by the population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of demonstrating how a QuantCrit‐orientation may support researchers in communicating their findings, scholars draw attention here to a few ways findings may be poorly represented, namely oversimplification (i. e., reducing the causes of an event so much that the connections between causes and effects are blurred or buried) and misrepresentation (i. e., the representations of findings to portray an untrue or distorted view of findings; Thiese et al, 2017). These pitfalls are associated with (a) separating critical social theory from findings (i. e., decontextualizing findings); (b) homogenizing diverse groups for analytical and interpretative purposes; and (c) failing to practice transparency in variables, populations, and methods (Morrow et al, 1994). Finally, although common in the presentation of qualitative work, quantitative research may benefit from explicitly considering and disclosing researcher positionality (Bourke, 2014).…”
Section: Quantcrit Praxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No attempt was made to quantitatively reduce the data, to treat them as adjudicating hypotheses, or to use them for intensive theory construction. Instead, the codes were used to enrich the theory, and to demonstrate its integrative potential, by examining how the abstract processes it specifies manifest in a particular concrete instance (Layder, 1998; Morrow & Brown, 1994). Based on recommendations from O’Connor and Joffe (2020), an iterative process with two independent coders was used to ensure reliability.…”
Section: Empirical Case Study: Narrative Orientations Toward Natural ...mentioning
confidence: 99%