The sociomaterial force theory of identity

Abstract

Foundational theories in social psychology tend to focus on the individual’s phenomenological experience, and to conceive of the environment and the individual as discrete entities. To overcome the ontological and epistemological limitations of such perspectives, we propose a theory rooted in culturally oriented existential philosophy. This sociomaterial force theory of identity emphasizes the reciprocal, historically contingent relationship between broad social and material forces on one hand, and processes of social and individual identity on the other. To concretize the framework, we compare it to current theories (social identity theory and social representations theory) and apply it to a qualitative case study of differences in how religious group members narrate the suffering brought on by natural disaster. We propose the theory can contribute to a more historical, dynamic, and truly interdisciplinary psychology, and would be especially useful for integrating multilevel data on the experience of a particular social group at a specified historical period.

In a double‐bind: Time–space distanciation, socioeconomic status, and coping with financial stress in the United States

“…As noted in another contribution to this Special Issue, a processual approach to precarity fits well with assemblage theory, which contends that “the social world is [best] conceptualized as a contingent and emergent ecosystem that is comprised of a nexus of interacting assemblages that are reproduced through ongoing social relations, human and non‐humane interactions, and institutional practices” (Rua et al, 2022, p. 4). Assemblage theory perspectives are currently burgeoning in social psychology (Cikara et al, 2022; Hodgetts et al, 2022; Sullivan et al, 2022) which suggests the time is ripe for moving the field towards a more processual, material, and fluid comprehension of how factors like SES impact psychology. Precarity appears to be an important construct for facilitating such a transition in our theoretical approach to social class.…”