2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Success Factors for Automatic Speech Recognition in the Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…<15% word error rate). Similar results have been reported by others using the Microsoft SR Engine [12] or Dragon [13]. To improve accuracy and understanding of SR captions an application RealTimeEdit was developed to enable corrections of SR captions to be made in real-time [14].…”
Section: Automatic Speech Recognition Captioningsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…<15% word error rate). Similar results have been reported by others using the Microsoft SR Engine [12] or Dragon [13]. To improve accuracy and understanding of SR captions an application RealTimeEdit was developed to enable corrections of SR captions to be made in real-time [14].…”
Section: Automatic Speech Recognition Captioningsupporting
confidence: 49%