2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical success criteria for mass house building projects in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
198
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
198
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of project success is developed with criteria and standards to help project participants to complete projects with the most desirable results [8]. However, this concept remains somewhat of an enigma as there is no agreement on what should be the critical success criteria on construction projects despite several studies [9]. A project is considered an overall success when the project achieves the technical performance specifications and missions, also a high level of satisfaction concerning the project outcome among organization, project team and users [10].…”
Section: Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of project success is developed with criteria and standards to help project participants to complete projects with the most desirable results [8]. However, this concept remains somewhat of an enigma as there is no agreement on what should be the critical success criteria on construction projects despite several studies [9]. A project is considered an overall success when the project achieves the technical performance specifications and missions, also a high level of satisfaction concerning the project outcome among organization, project team and users [10].…”
Section: Project Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the same line, it is not frequent to find management information regarding the need for intervention in adjoining buildings, which is paramount to the reduction of damage in such buildings. Information regarding planning is also overlooked, namely a quantification of labour, pace of work, specialised resources, technical capacity of the companies involved and technical monitoring needs, although all these are important for the success of the project (Chan et al 2002;ahadzie et al 2008;niu et al 2010;Parfitt, Sanvido 1993). Also absent from the analysed project designs are information regarding costs of intervention in urban areas, of maintenance period and the attribution of eventual tax benefits or incentives under the law into force.…”
Section: Case Study First Phase -Desk Review Of Building Retrofit Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahadzie et al [11] agree that there is not much accord on the determinants of project success, and that these ambiguities make it difficult to monitor project outcomes.…”
Section: Defining the Success Measures In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Project failure is defined in this case as the loss of value to Grootegeluk. This loss of value will be determined from three points adapted from Tishler et al [12], and the fourth point from Ahadzie et al [11], which is specific to the mining industry. Their different points of view to measure success of a project are: These four points are similar to those from an extensive study by White and Fortune [13] on the criteria for judging project success.…”
Section: Defining the Success Measures In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%