Journalism and mass communication is not one of those ancient disciplines that has had centuries to evolve into a mature, respected part of the modern university. Some disciplines were hundreds of years old when a "rather meager course of journalism instruction'' was established in 1869 at Washington and Lee University (O'Dell, 1935, p. 2); when the first newspaper printing class was offered in 1873 at Kansas State University (Wilcox, 1959, p. 5); and when the first school of journalism was established in 1908 at the University of Missouri (Dickson, 2000, Journalism and mass communication education, which endured substantial growing pains as it evolved during the l g t h and 2Oth centuries, clearly has an ongoing identity crisis. More than 80 years ago, Harrington (1919) felt justified in writing, "Of all subjects that have recently found a p. 12). place in the college curriculum, probably none is more intensely concerned in working out a pedagogical method than journalism" (p. 197).More recently, Rakow (1993) says journalism and mass communication education is " ... (a) gridlocked by real and imaginary obligations to students and employers, (b) fragmented and overly specialized, (c) partial and incomplete, and (d) passive in response to the pressing need for global change" (p. 155).' This study attempted to determine the status of two aspects of journalism and mass communication education that have been widely debated: (a) The relative weight of skills development and conceptual content, and (b) the extent to which students study the liberal arts and sciences, in courses outside communication and in communication courses.2