2018
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical-Size Bone Defects: Is There a Consensus for Diagnosis and Treatment?

Abstract: There is a significant burden of disease associated with bone defects, and their management is challenging. These injuries have a profound clinical and economic impact, and outcomes are limited by high rates of complication and reoperation, as well as poor functional outcomes. There remains a lack of consensus around definitions, reliable models, and best practices for the surgical management of bone defects. The current state of the literature on bone defects is reviewed here, with a focus on defining critica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
169
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(200 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
169
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone healing is a well-orchestrated process and for most minor fractures a mechanical fixation of the damaged bone region is sufficient for successful convalescence. However, if a defect reaches a critical size (~≥2.5 cm (Schemitsch, 2017 ; Nauth et al, 2018 ), depending on the surgical case), the endogenous regenerative capacity of bone tissue is insufficient for self-repair (Mothersill et al, 1991 ). Critical size bone defects caused by diseases such as osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoarthritis, osteomyelitis, osteoporosis, or conditions related to infection or induced by wear, still remain key challenges to be addressed in clinical practice (Porter et al, 2009 ; Nauth et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone healing is a well-orchestrated process and for most minor fractures a mechanical fixation of the damaged bone region is sufficient for successful convalescence. However, if a defect reaches a critical size (~≥2.5 cm (Schemitsch, 2017 ; Nauth et al, 2018 ), depending on the surgical case), the endogenous regenerative capacity of bone tissue is insufficient for self-repair (Mothersill et al, 1991 ). Critical size bone defects caused by diseases such as osteogenesis imperfecta, osteoarthritis, osteomyelitis, osteoporosis, or conditions related to infection or induced by wear, still remain key challenges to be addressed in clinical practice (Porter et al, 2009 ; Nauth et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, critical-sized defects can result from severe trauma, blast injuries, and large scale bone resection due to infection or tumors (Schemitsch, 2017). Some physiological factors that enhance the risk of non-unions include diabetes, obesity, inflammatory arthritis, and hypothyroidism (Nauth et al, 2018; Roddy et al, 2018). Orthopedic repair of critical-sized defects generally requires an invasive procedure that may include autologous or allogeneic bone grafting (Polo-Corrales et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trauma, tumor resection, bone infection, and regenerative disorder-caused bone defects are a challenge to the medical fraternity. 1 4 Autograft and allograft transplantations are the common methods applied by surgeons to treat bone defects; however, limited bone sources and immunological reactions are still a cause for worry. 4 6 Therefore, surgeons have long been interested in taking advantage of the properties of various metals for the reconstruction of bone defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%