The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical role of tellurium self-compensation in enhancing the thermoelectric performance of p-Type Bi0.4Sb1.6Te3 alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratio of a/c slightly increases meaning that Te/I co‐doping also introduces a small lattice distortion. According to the calculation of orientation factor (F = 0–1), [ 51 ] the F value of (00 l ) group bulk XRD pattern of Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) 0.0012 sample, which has the best ZT , is 0.023, indicating an extremely small orientation preference in the bulk sample (Figure S6f, Supporting Information). No obvious change in the grain size and morphology is observed in the SEM images of fresh fracture for Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) y samples (Figure S7a–e, Supporting Information), The backscattered electron image of Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) 0.0012 sample shows a uniformed surface without an evident contrast difference (Figure S7f, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of a/c slightly increases meaning that Te/I co‐doping also introduces a small lattice distortion. According to the calculation of orientation factor (F = 0–1), [ 51 ] the F value of (00 l ) group bulk XRD pattern of Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) 0.0012 sample, which has the best ZT , is 0.023, indicating an extremely small orientation preference in the bulk sample (Figure S6f, Supporting Information). No obvious change in the grain size and morphology is observed in the SEM images of fresh fracture for Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) y samples (Figure S7a–e, Supporting Information), The backscattered electron image of Bi 2 Te 2.9 S 0.1 (TeI 4 ) 0.0012 sample shows a uniformed surface without an evident contrast difference (Figure S7f, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stacking faults energy E f is vital for twins’ formation, where low E f means more favorable for the occurrence of twins. Since the sample always keeps in Te‐poor condition even in these samples with δ > 0 (reported in our previous work [ 55 ] ), there are only two cases that should be considered (Figure S4, Supporting Information), 1) stoichiometric Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3 and 2) Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3 with low Te content. For case two (2), it should be noted that Te vacancy is unstable due to the high formation energy and inclined to be occupied by the Bi or Sb atoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the twin boundaries might impede the carrier transport. According to data reported in our previous work, [ 55 ] the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3.01 exhibits a similar carrier concentration with the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 2.99 (2.37 × 10 19 cm −3 for Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3.01 and 2.48 × 10 19 cm −3 for Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 2.99 ), while the carrier mobility of Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3.01 are 36% higher than that of Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 2.99 (303.1 cm 2 V −1 s −1 for the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3.01 and 222.0 cm 2 V −1 s −1 for the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 2.99 ). The only difference between these two samples is that the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 2.99 presents much higher twin density than the Bi 0.4 Sb 1.6 Te 3.01 , shown in Figure 2 a,b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alongside phase constitution, synthesis methodology and processing temperature play a vital role in determining the physical and transport properties, particularly in (Bi,Sb) 2 Te 3 alloys, which is largely due to their propensity toward nonstoichiometry and tellurium volatility . To further enhance the ZT in p-type Bi 2– x Sb x Te 3 -based materials, which are commercially synthesized using zone melting methods, nanostructuring using ball milling followed by bulk consolidation employing hot pressing has been most successfully demonstrated. ,, However, severe plastic deformation during the milling process was found to induce a “donor-like” effect, which promotes minority charge carriers, that is, electrons, thereby deteriorating the electrical properties. , Alternatively, chemical synthesis provides a convenient means of obtaining nanocrystals, while spark plasma sintering (SPS) ,,, offers higher heating rates to prevent grain growth and achieve higher densification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%