The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics 2020
DOI: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0284.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Pedagogy in Language Teaching

Abstract: Critical pedagogy in language teaching is a perspective in language curriculum theory and instructional practice that supports language teaching and associated analyses to promote social justice. This entry defines critical pedagogy and briefly sketches the areas with which it is concerned and indicates both classical sources in the area and recent developments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. ADS and 'cultural differences' Since Kaplan's (1966) famous 'doodle' article positing the influence of 'cultural thought patterns' on ESL students' academic writing, researchers have debated how ostensibly 'cultural' factors shape orientations towards features of academic discourse such as text organization (e.g., Chien, 2011;Li, 2014), source attribution (e.g., Li & Flowerdew, 2019;Pecorari & Petríc, 2014), critical thinking (e.g., Tian & Low, 2011), critical literacy (e.g., Crookes, 2021), and peer feedback (e.g. Hu, 2019;Yu & Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. ADS and 'cultural differences' Since Kaplan's (1966) famous 'doodle' article positing the influence of 'cultural thought patterns' on ESL students' academic writing, researchers have debated how ostensibly 'cultural' factors shape orientations towards features of academic discourse such as text organization (e.g., Chien, 2011;Li, 2014), source attribution (e.g., Li & Flowerdew, 2019;Pecorari & Petríc, 2014), critical thinking (e.g., Tian & Low, 2011), critical literacy (e.g., Crookes, 2021), and peer feedback (e.g. Hu, 2019;Yu & Lee, 2016).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] (p. 114) Although many researchers have been for some time already bringing about these issues with a certain frequency, it is plausible to affirm that a more intense dialogue between language education/teaching and critical pedagogy, its premises, and practical implications, is a fairly recent initiative. Crookes [15] (p. 1) sheds some light on the importance of this dialogue, arguing that "critical pedagogy in language teaching is a perspective in language curriculum theory and instructional practice that supports and advances teaching and the study of languages in ways that would promote social justice." Aligned with that premise, Akbari [35] criticizes this persistent gap in language learning and teaching arguing that the great majority of the discussion so far has been limited to CP's theoretical bases and intentions and very little has been done to really connect CP with the language classroom universe.…”
Section: Critical Pedagogy the Global Spread Of English And Eltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the great potential and development of ELT, a significant number of English teachers, native and non-native, are being formally educated, especially in the so-called periphery countries, where these professionals get their degrees not only at the tertiary level, but also in innumerous programs offered by hundreds of language centers spread around the globe. Although ELT's remarkable expansion and structure seem to be founded in an environment of apparent neutrality, several authors like Crookes [14,15], Jordão and Marques [16], Kumaravadivelu [17,18], Phillipson [19][20][21], Pennycook [22][23][24], Rajagopalan [25][26][27], Siqueira [28,29], among others, are critical of that enterprise for its being basically oriented by a sense of domination. Phillipson [19], for example, has continually called our attention to the way the ELT industry has been contributing to the global diffusion of English in a neutral, acritical, and apolitical manner, which, according to him, has been conducted as a monumental effort to impose an imperialist agenda.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%