“…Due to the great potential and development of ELT, a significant number of English teachers, native and non-native, are being formally educated, especially in the so-called periphery countries, where these professionals get their degrees not only at the tertiary level, but also in innumerous programs offered by hundreds of language centers spread around the globe. Although ELT's remarkable expansion and structure seem to be founded in an environment of apparent neutrality, several authors like Crookes [14,15], Jordão and Marques [16], Kumaravadivelu [17,18], Phillipson [19][20][21], Pennycook [22][23][24], Rajagopalan [25][26][27], Siqueira [28,29], among others, are critical of that enterprise for its being basically oriented by a sense of domination. Phillipson [19], for example, has continually called our attention to the way the ELT industry has been contributing to the global diffusion of English in a neutral, acritical, and apolitical manner, which, according to him, has been conducted as a monumental effort to impose an imperialist agenda.…”