2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical issues encountered in the analysis of protein-phenolic binding interactions via fluorescence spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When some added substances are close to the Trp residues, the fluorescence of the Trp residues will be quenched and the fluorescence intensity of the protease will decrease. [ 25 ] As shown in the Figure 1, with increase in the CAPE concentration, the fluorescence emission peak intensity of the protease at 345 nm gradually decreases and a red shift appears at the excitation wavelength of 280 nm. The results indicated that CAPE interacts with protease to form the CAPE–protease complex and there is a hydrophilic interaction between CAPE and protease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When some added substances are close to the Trp residues, the fluorescence of the Trp residues will be quenched and the fluorescence intensity of the protease will decrease. [ 25 ] As shown in the Figure 1, with increase in the CAPE concentration, the fluorescence emission peak intensity of the protease at 345 nm gradually decreases and a red shift appears at the excitation wavelength of 280 nm. The results indicated that CAPE interacts with protease to form the CAPE–protease complex and there is a hydrophilic interaction between CAPE and protease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging ability was evaluated according to the research method of the previous work with some modification. [ 25 ] An aliquot solution of the Try–CAPE, Pep–CAPE or α ‐Chy‐CAPE solution complexes with the concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 60 μmol·kg −1 was added to 1 ml DPPH (0.5 mmol·kg −1 in ethanol). The solution was thoroughly mixed and stored at room temperature in the dark for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPI attained the largest K sv value, inferring that 2‐pentylfuran may cause a stronger quenching of SPI intrinsic fluorescence than PnPI and WPI. Therefore, a modified Stern–Volmer equation was applied to determine the binding constant: logF0FFgoodbreak=log0.25emKgoodbreak+nH0.25emlog0.25em[]Q where K is the binding constant and n H is the Hill coefficient (an indicator of binding site cooperativity) 37 . Commonly, the modified model is applied to static quenching originating from the formation of the protein–flavor complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K is the binding constant and n H is the Hill coefficient (an indicator of binding site cooperativity). 37 Commonly, the modified model is applied to static quenching originating from the formation of the protein-flavor complex. High concentrations of 2-pentylfuran were able to induce its dynamic quenching to WPI, so binding constants were calculated by its low concentration data, as was the Hill coefficient (Fig.…”
Section: Fluorescence Quenching Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proteins or hydrolysates have intrinsic emission fluorescence because of their tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine residues (Condict & Kasapis, 2022). The fluorescence emission spectra of Try‐pcRHs and Try‐pcRH‐Iron were shown in Figure 4a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%