2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2020.106945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical evaluation and thermodynamic modeling of the Pd–Sn system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Pd 2 Sn phase of the Pd–Sn system, a single-sublattice model (Pd 2 Sn) 1 was used [ 19 ], whereas a two-sublattice model (Pd) 0.667 (In) 0.333 was proposed in [ 13 ] for the InPd 2 phase of the In–Pd system. As these phases actually form continuous solid solution in the ternary, similar models should describe both.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the Pd 2 Sn phase of the Pd–Sn system, a single-sublattice model (Pd 2 Sn) 1 was used [ 19 ], whereas a two-sublattice model (Pd) 0.667 (In) 0.333 was proposed in [ 13 ] for the InPd 2 phase of the In–Pd system. As these phases actually form continuous solid solution in the ternary, similar models should describe both.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between enthalpies of formation of Pd 3 Sn phases with Cu 3 Au and Al 3 Ti type structures was taken from the ab initio calculation presented in the OQMD [ 32 ]. Gibbs energy function of the virtual Pd:Sn end-member of the τ 1 phase was calculated by adding of this difference to the Gibbs energy function of stable Pd 3 Sn phase [ 19 ] Other parameters of the virtual τ 1 phase in the Pd–Sn binary were obtained from estimated metastable equilibria with its participation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation