1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.11.4077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical dynamics of ferromagnets in6εdimensions: General discussion and detailed calculation

Abstract: We report in detail a study of the critical dynamics of a model ferromagnet in 6-& dimensions both above and below T" for small E. The precession of spins in the local magnetic field plays a major role in the dynamics. Its effect can be ignored at 6 or more dimensions, as many authors have previously observed. At a dimension slightly less than 6, the effect is nontrivial but tractable by perturbation theory. We carry out a renormalization-group analysis and determine the dynamic exponent z = 4e/2 = 1 + d/2, ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
157
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 326 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5.10.6 The DIA and stochastic particle acceleration Maasjost and Elsässer (1982) criticized the use of the DIA for the stochastic-acceleration problem on the grounds that it either agreed with much simpler Fokker-Planck theory or did not agree with simulation data. Their arguments were analyzed in detail by Dimits and Krommes (1986).…”
Section: Self-consistency and Polarization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5.10.6 The DIA and stochastic particle acceleration Maasjost and Elsässer (1982) criticized the use of the DIA for the stochastic-acceleration problem on the grounds that it either agreed with much simpler Fokker-Planck theory or did not agree with simulation data. Their arguments were analyzed in detail by Dimits and Krommes (1986).…”
Section: Self-consistency and Polarization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of Yakhot and Orszag (1986) 235 explicitly involves an additive random forcing described by a controversial (Lam, 1992) correspondence principle. Other methods that extend the work of Ma and Mazenko (1975) do not explicitly introduce the random forcing; see Zhou et al (1994) for further references. Eyink (1994) has clearly discussed the differences between various technical approaches to RG calculations.…”
Section: Renormalization-group Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we are interested in a temperature region near the Curie temperature of the SI, where the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with fixed magnetization size is invalid, we begin with the following time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau type equation 62 :…”
Section: Appendix B: Spin Pumping From Fluctuating Ferromagnetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, (14), is known from statics. The second, (15), means that n·j α , the normal component of the current j α = −λ 0 (∇ δH δφ α + f 0 ǫ αβγ φ β ∇φ γ ), whose negative divergence gives the right-hand side of (10), vanishes at B. [The precession term yields a contribution ∝ ǫ αβγ φ β ∂ n φ γ which is zero by (14)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to scaling considerations [13,14] and RG work [15,16], the dynamic bulk critical exponent z is given by…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%