2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental statistical descriptions of plasma turbulence in magnetic fields

Abstract: A pedagogical review of the historical development and current status (as of early 2000) of systematic statistical theories of plasma turbulence is undertaken. Emphasis is on conceptual foundations and methodology, not practical applications. Particular attention is paid to equations and formalism appropriate to strongly magnetized, fully ionized plasmas. Extensive reference to the literature on neutral-fluid turbulence is made, but the unique properties and problems of plasmas are emphasized throughout. Discu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
397
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 650 publications
(359 reference statements)
6
397
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because in the presence of relatively strong electron density fluctuations and of the corresponding perpendicular electric field (see the above estimate of n k /n), the ion polarization drift velocity becomes comparable to the velocity of fluid fluctuations, and so ions can drift compressively across the magnetic field lines. This leads to the coupling of density fluctuations to the Alfvénic fluctuations; a similar effect is at work in the so-called electromagnetic drift wave (or drift Alfvén) turbulence, which has been investigated in the context of plasma fusion devices (e.g., Hasegawa & Mima 1978;Hasegawa & Wakatani 1983;Terry & Horton 1982;Hazeltine 1983;Camargo et al 1996;Krommes 2002). Interestingly, numerical simulations of such turbulence have revealed a rather high level of density fluctuations (in equipartition with kinetic fluctuations) and statistical properties that are clearly non-Gaussian (e.g., Terry et al 2001;Graddock et al 1991).…”
Section: The Onset Of Turbulence In Strongly Ionized Cloud Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This happens because in the presence of relatively strong electron density fluctuations and of the corresponding perpendicular electric field (see the above estimate of n k /n), the ion polarization drift velocity becomes comparable to the velocity of fluid fluctuations, and so ions can drift compressively across the magnetic field lines. This leads to the coupling of density fluctuations to the Alfvénic fluctuations; a similar effect is at work in the so-called electromagnetic drift wave (or drift Alfvén) turbulence, which has been investigated in the context of plasma fusion devices (e.g., Hasegawa & Mima 1978;Hasegawa & Wakatani 1983;Terry & Horton 1982;Hazeltine 1983;Camargo et al 1996;Krommes 2002). Interestingly, numerical simulations of such turbulence have revealed a rather high level of density fluctuations (in equipartition with kinetic fluctuations) and statistical properties that are clearly non-Gaussian (e.g., Terry et al 2001;Graddock et al 1991).…”
Section: The Onset Of Turbulence In Strongly Ionized Cloud Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be quantified by the Kubo number K, 21,22 the ratio between the Eulerian autocorrelation time, s ac , of the fluctuating potential and the particle flight time, s f :s f is defined as k x =hv x i, where k x is the radial correlation decay length, and hv x i the root mean square radial velocity of a test particle in the turbulent field. For K < 1, the autocorrelation time of the turbulent field is shorter than the transit time of a test particle around a turbulent eddy, justifying the use of a random-walk diffusive model.…”
Section: B Kubo Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been developed for solving fluctuation problems [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In this work, we treat random fluctuations as noise and use noise theory to study the statistical properties of stationary Markovian random fluctuations.…”
Section: Introduction To Noise Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%