2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.6.021004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical Doping for the Onset of Fermi-Surface Reconstruction by Charge-Density-Wave Order in the Cuprate SuperconductorLa2xSrxCuO

Abstract: The Seebeck coefficient S of the cuprate superconductor La 2−x Sr x CuO 4 (LSCO) was measured in magnetic fields large enough to access the normal state at low temperatures, for a range of Sr concentrations from x ¼ 0.07 to x ¼ 0.15. For x ¼ 0.11, 0.12, 0.125, and 0.13, S=T decreases upon cooling to become negative at low temperatures. The same behavior is observed in the Hall coefficient R H ðTÞ. In analogy with other hole-doped cuprates at similar hole concentrations p, the negative S and R H show that the F… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
54
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In LSCO, the Seebeck coefficient in high field was used in similar fashion to pin down the endpoint of FSR, giving p CDW = 0.15 ± 0.005 [25]. This is again consistent with the fact that XRD detects no CDW modulations in LSCO at p = 0.15 [40].…”
Section: B Cdw Critical Pointsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In LSCO, the Seebeck coefficient in high field was used in similar fashion to pin down the endpoint of FSR, giving p CDW = 0.15 ± 0.005 [25]. This is again consistent with the fact that XRD detects no CDW modulations in LSCO at p = 0.15 [40].…”
Section: B Cdw Critical Pointsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This means that the critical doping for CDW order, p CDW = 0.16 ± 0.005, is distinctly lower than the pseudogap critical point, which in YBCO is located at p = 0.19 ± 0.01 [24]. A similar separation of normal-state critical points was also found in LSCO from high-field Seebeck measurements [25], with p CDW = 0.15 ± 0.005 and p = 0.18 [4]. The implication is that the pseudogap phase is distinct from the CDW phase.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In nearly all cuprate families, charge order in the form of disordered charge modulations have been reported in underdoped compounds, with detection terminating at [19] or before [6,20] the doping where the FS transition occurs. In (Bi,Pb) 2 (Sr,La) 2 CuO 6+δ , Bi2201, however, charge modulations extend into the overdoped regime [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to overdoped cuprates where large cylindrical Fermi surface yields a carrier density n=p+1 (p being doping level) [11][12][13], the total volume of Fermi surface in underdoped systems is a small fraction of the first Brillouin zone and corresponds to n=p through Luttinger's theorem [14][15][16][17]. This small n should be reflected in zero-field transport.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%