2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.127456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical c-Met-inhibitor interactions resolved from molecular dynamics simulations of different c-Met complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the best conformation was selected on the basis of bonding energy (vdW and electrostatic interaction energy) or binding affinity between three interacting systems. The total binding free energy is an average of vdW and electrostatic interaction energies [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the best conformation was selected on the basis of bonding energy (vdW and electrostatic interaction energy) or binding affinity between three interacting systems. The total binding free energy is an average of vdW and electrostatic interaction energies [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy in molecular dynamics simulations may help in investigating and analyzing the van der Waals and electrostatic bonds. The greater (i.e., more negative) the absolute energy of the van der Waals and the electrostatic bonds, the stronger the interactions in a given reaction simulation. The total energy of the van der Waals and electrostatic bonding is also an indicator of the urea adsorption intensity. Strong interactions between the adsorbent and urea may hence be associated with higher capabilities in urea adsorption.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong interactions between the adsorbent and urea may hence be associated with higher capabilities in urea adsorption. Here, the energy analysis was carried out by the mmpbsa software. The van der Waals and electrostatic energies were calculated for N2, N5, N8, N15, N10, PC, and pristine graphene. The sum of the energies was also averaged during the simulation period.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energies from the electrostatic bonds and vdW bonds in the simulations for Fullerene-N5, Fullerene-N8, Fullerene-N10, Fullerene-N15, Fullerene-N25, Fullerene-P, and Fullerene are calculated by the mmpbsa [57,58] software. The sum of the energies resulting from the intermolecular bonds is a good indicator for the intensity of urea adsorption in the simulations performed in this paper [59][60][61].…”
Section: Intermolecular Bonds By Energy Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%