1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.72.2121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical behavior of Si:P at the metal-insulator transition

Abstract: TransitionThe apparent value of the conductivity exponent p =0. 5 at the T 0 metal-insulator transition in Si:P has remained a puzzle for over a decade [1]. Stupp et al. [2] recently have proposed a reanalysis of the Hence, the 6% smaller n, required by Stupp et al. to raise p would not permit a self-consistent treatment of the observed critical behavior on both sides of the metal-insulator transition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
34
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant hysteresis effects are observed in N i(S, Se) 2 and if conventional (as opposed to activated) scaling is assumed then the dynamical scaling exponent is surprisingly large (Husmann et al, 1996). In the well studied (Rosenbaum et al, 1994;Stupp et al, 1994) doped semiconductor SiP there are large sample to sample variations that are apparent only at very low temperatures, T < 60mK, suggesting equilibration problems due to very long relaxation times, and, possibly, dynamical heterogeneity effects. The glassy aspects of this has been discussed in detail elsewhere (Belitz and Kirkpatrick, 1995a).…”
Section: B Disordered and Interacting Electrons: Connections With Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant hysteresis effects are observed in N i(S, Se) 2 and if conventional (as opposed to activated) scaling is assumed then the dynamical scaling exponent is surprisingly large (Husmann et al, 1996). In the well studied (Rosenbaum et al, 1994;Stupp et al, 1994) doped semiconductor SiP there are large sample to sample variations that are apparent only at very low temperatures, T < 60mK, suggesting equilibration problems due to very long relaxation times, and, possibly, dynamical heterogeneity effects. The glassy aspects of this has been discussed in detail elsewhere (Belitz and Kirkpatrick, 1995a).…”
Section: B Disordered and Interacting Electrons: Connections With Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Here N c is fixed already within an accuracy of 0.16% corresponding to the fractional difference in N between the first and second samples from the bottom, i.e., unlike the case for Si:P, 30,43,44 the determination of the critical conductivity exponent will not be affected by the ambiguity in the value of N c . was criticized by Shlimak et al 45 for our doping level's not being close enough to N c .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it is not necessary to include interactions to characterize the critical behaviour although these can be important outside the critical regime. It has to be noted that some reserves have been made [23] about the results obtained in Ref. [22] and it will be interesting to check carefully this problem in order to clarify the situation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%