1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.73.3137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Broken Time Reversal Symmetry Modify the Critical Behavior at the Metal-Insulator Transition in 3-Dimensional Disordered Systems?

Abstract: The critical behaviour of 3-dimensional disordered systems with magnetic field is investigated by analyzing the spectral fluctuations of the energy spectrum. We show that in the thermodynamic limit we have two different regimes, one for the metallic side and one for the insulating side with different level statistics. The third statistics which occurs only exactly at the critical point is independent of the magnetic field. The critical behaviour which is determined by the symmetry of the system at the critical… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

14
52
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
14
52
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the insulating regime, although the decay rate A c is larger than unity due to the level repulsion. The power law with the exponent α ≈ 1.2, which was recently obtained [17] by an analysis of the shape of P (s) in the range 0 < s < 5 for system sizes L ≤ 21 deviates from our results for s > ∼ 4. The linear asymptotic behavior of ln I c (s) is in contrast to the power law with α ≈ 1.31 obtained numerically [5] for smaller systems L ≤ 12.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to the insulating regime, although the decay rate A c is larger than unity due to the level repulsion. The power law with the exponent α ≈ 1.2, which was recently obtained [17] by an analysis of the shape of P (s) in the range 0 < s < 5 for system sizes L ≤ 21 deviates from our results for s > ∼ 4. The linear asymptotic behavior of ln I c (s) is in contrast to the power law with α ≈ 1.31 obtained numerically [5] for smaller systems L ≤ 12.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The latter distribution decays faster than the Poissonian (α = 1), but slower than the Wigner surmise (α = 2). Several numerical calculations for the 3D Anderson model were recently performed [5,17] in order to analyze P c (s). The results were found to be consistent with the latter of the above suggestions with an exponent α ≈ 1.2−1.3 (ν ≈ 1.5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the critical disorder W c = 16.5, the mobility edge occurs at E c = 0, all states with |E| > 0 are localized [3,4] and states with E = 0 are multifractal [3,17]. The value of ν has been computed from the non-linear sigma-model [19], transfermatrix methods [2,6], Green functions methods [2], and energy-level statistics [5,20]. Here we have chosen ν = 1.3, which is in agreement with experimental results in Si:P [9] and the numerical data of Ref.…”
Section: The Anderson Model Of Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson tight-binding Hamiltonian on a d-dimensional lattice L d with or without a magnetic field is defined as [8,9,10],…”
Section: Anderson Hamiltonians and Random Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%