2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical aspects of natural gas pipelines risk assessments. A case-study application on buried layout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The risk assessment procedure is based mostly on the chance of the detected risk occurring, and its potential risk implications are specifically analyzed through hypothetical scenarios of accidents [2]. Concerning the proposed project, a risk matrix designed to integrate risk severity and probability factors has been used to primary hazards such as jet fire resulting from natural gas pipelines failure [25]. The risk connected with the natural gas distribution network was semi-quantitatively evaluated by employing order of the magnitude data as a product of probability and seriousness/consequence (risk rate = severity/consequence factor × probability factor) [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The risk assessment procedure is based mostly on the chance of the detected risk occurring, and its potential risk implications are specifically analyzed through hypothetical scenarios of accidents [2]. Concerning the proposed project, a risk matrix designed to integrate risk severity and probability factors has been used to primary hazards such as jet fire resulting from natural gas pipelines failure [25]. The risk connected with the natural gas distribution network was semi-quantitatively evaluated by employing order of the magnitude data as a product of probability and seriousness/consequence (risk rate = severity/consequence factor × probability factor) [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the proposed project, a risk matrix designed to integrate risk severity and probability factors has been used to primary hazards such as jet fire resulting from natural gas pipelines failure [25]. The risk connected with the natural gas distribution network was semi-quantitatively evaluated by employing order of the magnitude data as a product of probability and seriousness/consequence (risk rate = severity/consequence factor × probability factor) [25]. The significance of these project hazards was determined through categorization as high, medium, low, and very low based on the risk assessment [26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two weak points of this research were the lack of definitions and background of the research. Vairo et al (2021) examined the risk assessment aspect of natural gas lines. By investigating historical accidents in NG pipelines in the United States, Canada and the European Union, they concluded that the critical factors causing these accidents included the failure mode, immediate and root cause, evolving scenario, degree of confinement produced by the surroundings and ignition timing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Vairo et al. (2021) examined the risk assessment aspect of natural gas lines.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metal smelting system includes the blast furnace body, the iron casting yard in front of the furnace, the tuyere and above platforms, the top charging system, the hot blast stove, the crude gas dust removal system, the TRT residual pressure power generation system, the molten iron and slag transportation line, the slag processing system, and the coal Pulverized powder injection station, gas purification system and other equipment subsystems [8] . The smelting production process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Leakage Accidents In the Smelting Processmentioning
confidence: 99%