2013
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.800170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from CNG transit buses equipped with three-way catalysts compared to lean-burn engines and oxidation catalyst technologies

Abstract: Engine and exhaust control technologies applied to compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses have advanced from lean-burn, to lean-burn with oxidation catalyst (OxC), to stoichiometric combustion with three-way catalyst (TWC). With this technology advancement, regulated gaseous and particulate matter emissions have been significantly reduced. Two CNG transit buses equipped with stoichiometric combustion engines and TWCs were tested on a chassis dynamometer, and their emissions were measured. Emissions from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
12
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite higher CO emissions from the CNG compared to diesel vehicles, brake-specific emissions were at least three times below the engine dynamometer certification standards. Earlier chassis dynamometer testing of TWCequipped CNG buses with MY 2007-2011 Cummins 8.9-L engines reported CO emissions between 6 and 27 g/mi over various vocational and standard chassis dynamometer driving cycles [30,31]; per-mile emissions reported from the 12-L CNG engine in this study was 7.6-14.4 g/mi indicating comparable levels of control by stoichiometric combustion and TWC aftertreatment. Generally for both CNG and diesel-powered vehicles in this study, CO emissions were lower for routes with higher vehicle load and speeds, and emissions were slightly higher for lowerspeed driving in Near-Dock and Local Drayage Routes.…”
Section: Co Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite higher CO emissions from the CNG compared to diesel vehicles, brake-specific emissions were at least three times below the engine dynamometer certification standards. Earlier chassis dynamometer testing of TWCequipped CNG buses with MY 2007-2011 Cummins 8.9-L engines reported CO emissions between 6 and 27 g/mi over various vocational and standard chassis dynamometer driving cycles [30,31]; per-mile emissions reported from the 12-L CNG engine in this study was 7.6-14.4 g/mi indicating comparable levels of control by stoichiometric combustion and TWC aftertreatment. Generally for both CNG and diesel-powered vehicles in this study, CO emissions were lower for routes with higher vehicle load and speeds, and emissions were slightly higher for lowerspeed driving in Near-Dock and Local Drayage Routes.…”
Section: Co Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…While these THC results are an order of magnitude higher than the NMHC certification standard, they are unlikely to indicate an exceedance of the NMHC standard due to cross sensitivity of the THC detector to methane, which has been shown in previous studies to account for ∼95 % of the THC signal for stoichiometric CNG engines equipped with TWC [30]. …”
Section: Thc Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We take the ratios between the emissions factors for diesel and CNG buses and apply them to diesel trucks and get CNG truck factors. Before doing so, as shown in Figure 3, we adjust CNG bus emissions factors based on vehicle test data (Yoon et al 2013;WVU 2014) to reflect recent advances in CNG vehicles such as stoichiometric engine equipped with a three-way catalyst (TWC) system. MOVES also provides no emissions factors for hybrid vehicles.…”
Section: Electric Grid (Average and Marginal)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adjustment factors for MOVES2014-based tail-pipe emissions rates for CNG medium-duty truck. Two sets of vehicle test data(Yoon et al 2013; WVU 2014) for EPA Heavy-Duty Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (HD-UDDS) were used for reference (average of the two data sets).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, stoichiometric engines with TWCs produce higher CO emissions than lean-burn engines [14]. Particulate Matter (PM) emissions from both stoichiometric and lean-burn combustion NG engines are very low due to the almost homogeneous combustion of the air-gas mixture, and the absence of large hydrocarbon chains and aromatics in the fuel [15]. For NGVs, one issue that has been shown to be important with respect to emissions is the effect of changing the composition of the fuel.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%