1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.29.500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for the Elimination of Discrete Ambiguities in Nuclear Optical Potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
53
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
10
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[130]), it is highly desirable to have further high-precision measurement for the elastic 11 Li+ 12 C scattering at 30 -50 MeV/nucleon, which would not only give a final answer to this intriguing question but also provide valuable scattering data to further probe the 2n-halo wave function of 11 Li. We finally note that the refractive pattern predicted by us [130] for the elastic 8 He scattering around 30 MeV/nucleon has been confirmed in the elastic 8 He+ 4 He scattering data measured at 26 MeV/nucleon by Wolski et al [135], where one observed a broad shoulder-like maximum of the elastic cross section at large angles which is dominated by the farside scattering. These data are, however, not complete and lack the small-angle diffractive part which makes an accurate OM or folding model analysis difficult.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[130]), it is highly desirable to have further high-precision measurement for the elastic 11 Li+ 12 C scattering at 30 -50 MeV/nucleon, which would not only give a final answer to this intriguing question but also provide valuable scattering data to further probe the 2n-halo wave function of 11 Li. We finally note that the refractive pattern predicted by us [130] for the elastic 8 He scattering around 30 MeV/nucleon has been confirmed in the elastic 8 He+ 4 He scattering data measured at 26 MeV/nucleon by Wolski et al [135], where one observed a broad shoulder-like maximum of the elastic cross section at large angles which is dominated by the farside scattering. These data are, however, not complete and lack the small-angle diffractive part which makes an accurate OM or folding model analysis difficult.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…As already mentioned, the first observation of nuclear rainbow was made some 30 years ago by Goldberg et al [8,9,10] in their experiments on elastic α-nucleus scattering at E lab ≈ 140 MeV (see Fig. 6).…”
Section: Nuclear Rainbowmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Coulomb and centrifugal interactions of two nuclei are well known, but the nuclear component is far from being fully understood [11,12]. The nuclear component of the interaction potential is often parameterized by the optical potential, and have the Woods-Saxon shape [13][14][15]. The real part of the optical potential can be extracted by fitting the elastic scattering angular distributions [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the nucleus-nucleus case, significant progress has been achieved concerning this question during the last decade [1], as a consequence of the measurement of accurate and extensive elastic scattering data at intermediate energies. Nuclear rainbow scattering, first observed in a systems [2][3][4] and later in light heavy ions [5][6][7], probes the nucleus-nucleus potential not only at the surface region but also at smaller distances, and ambiguities in the real part of the potentials have been removed. The resulting phenomenological interactions have significant dependence upon the bombarding energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems correspond to quite different nonlocality range parameters: b 0.075 fm ( 12 C 1 208 Pb), b 0.14 fm ( 12 C 1 12 C), b 0.23 fm (a 1 58 Ni), and b 0.28 fm (a 1 12 C). For the first two systems, the data are available at a wide energy range (1 # E lab ͞A proj # 200 MeV͞nucleon), whereas the last two systems represent typical cases of refractive scattering that have been studied in details in the early 1970s [2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%