1984
DOI: 10.2307/1981508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for Identifying a Refereed Journal

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Ohio State University Pressis collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Higher Education This content downloaded from 138.38.44.95 on M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-five years of data are sufficient to draw meaningful conclusions regarding EO performance discourse trends. Moreover, the search was restricted to scholarly journals because articles in these publications undergo a rigorous peer review process (Miller & Serzan, 1984), and so are generally believed to be of a higher quality than non-journal articles, such as book chapters or unpublished works (David & Han, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-five years of data are sufficient to draw meaningful conclusions regarding EO performance discourse trends. Moreover, the search was restricted to scholarly journals because articles in these publications undergo a rigorous peer review process (Miller & Serzan, 1984), and so are generally believed to be of a higher quality than non-journal articles, such as book chapters or unpublished works (David & Han, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu bak›mdan, hakem denetimli dergilerin niteli¤inin ölçülmesi için çeflitli kriterler getirilmifltir. Örne¤in Miller ve Serzan (1984), hakemli dergilerin makale de¤erlendirme aflamala-r›ndaki uygulamalar›n› inceleyerek, ilgili etkinli¤i ölçmeye yönelik bir çal›flma yürütmüfllerdir. Kozak (1999aKozak ( , 2003c, haz›rlam›fl oldu¤u akademik dergi rehberlerinde, dergilerin farkl›l›klar›n›n makale de¤erlendirme ölçütlerinin temel alarak belirlenebilece¤ini ortaya atm›flt›r.…”
Section: Giriflunclassified
“…Önde gelen analitik çal›flmalardan biri de, Miller ve Serzan (1984) taraf›ndan yap›lm›fl olan ve hakemli dergilerin özelliklerinin incelendi¤i araflt›rmad›r. 243 dergi üzerinde gerçeklefltirilen araflt›rmada, dergilerin makale denetimi ile ilgili uygulamalar›na iliflkin baz› bulgulara ulafl›lm›flt›r.…”
Section: Literatürunclassified
“…From a somewhat less obvious base, we can argue that the definition of a &dquo;refereed journal&dquo; (Miller and Serzan 1984) includes moving beyond being a juried or peer-reviewed publication and demand that it have additional patterns that allow for theongoing constitution of the community. These would include publishing the journal policy as fully as possible, indicating to authors what the criteria for manuscript acceptance are, providing feedback to authors as to why papers were not accepted, among others.…”
Section: Heuristic Framework: the Knowledge Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%