2009
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2008.027623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by evidence that attitude toward academic-industry partnerships influences behavior (Glaser and Bero, 2005;Nestle, 2016), research documenting attitudes of public health academics toward accepting funds from for-profit corporations are urgently needed-particularly concerning those industries whose products harm health. Documenting these attitudes may stimulate dialogue around these issues, enhance awareness of the possible negative consequences and promote the development of policies to govern the receipt of such funds (Cohen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guided by evidence that attitude toward academic-industry partnerships influences behavior (Glaser and Bero, 2005;Nestle, 2016), research documenting attitudes of public health academics toward accepting funds from for-profit corporations are urgently needed-particularly concerning those industries whose products harm health. Documenting these attitudes may stimulate dialogue around these issues, enhance awareness of the possible negative consequences and promote the development of policies to govern the receipt of such funds (Cohen et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Funding of research through a tax on tobacco and alcohol in California and Thailand shows that this approach is feasible.…”
Section: What Can Be Done?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Added to this, governments are subject to the complicating influences of industry advocacy bodies such as the Council for Tobacco Research, BAT, ICAP and the Portman Group [28,29]. A more prudent approach would be to wait until international guidelines and conventions on addictive consumptions are well established and are actively guiding the ethical behaviour of governments [30–32].…”
Section: An Alternative Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%