Abstract:Requirements negotiation is a centralized process of making a decision in order to resolve conflicts in the requirements of the stakeholder. The negotiation will enable the shared vision of software to be developed among the heterogeneous stakeholder in the software industry to be achieved. Many process models used for the negotiation of stakeholder’s requirements have been proposed for the software industry by the research community, yet the acceptance of these process models is discouraging. This study tends… Show more
“…Challenges [4] Conflict resolution [12] Conflict resolution [10] Conflict resolution [42] Communication [6] Decision making [35] Decision making [9] Decision making and conflict resolution [17] Performance of RN tool [16] Performance [24] Managing requirement changes [18] Performance [43] Communication [20] Communication [22] Communication [19] Communication [44] Requirement analysis [41] Managing requirement changes [11] Conflict resolution [1] Decision making [45] Decision making and conflict resolution [36] Decision making [46] Decision making [47] Performance [33] Decision Making [15] Performance [2] Conflict resolution [38] Decision-making [48] Decision-making [49] Performance and Decision making [13] Performance [14] Performance [8] Decision-making and performance [21] Communication [50] Decision-making VI. RESEARCH FINDINGS During searching and data extraction from the selected papers, many challenges were identified in software requirements negotiation.…”
Requirements negotiation involves discussion on the requirements conflict to have some compromise that will satisfy the participating stakeholders of a software project. The output of a requirement negotiation is a set of satisfied requirements of two or more parties. In this paper, we present a systematic review of requirements negotiation challenges. The study adopted 34 papers from the final study selection process which were analyzed based on the requirements negotiation challenges they addressed. The identified challenges are decision-making, communication, performance, managing requirement changes, and conflict resolution. The output of the study indicates that decision-making is addressed by 33% of the studies reviewed, followed by the performance with 22%, conflict resolution with 19%, while 16% focus on stakeholders’ communication, and managing requirements changes has 10%.
“…Challenges [4] Conflict resolution [12] Conflict resolution [10] Conflict resolution [42] Communication [6] Decision making [35] Decision making [9] Decision making and conflict resolution [17] Performance of RN tool [16] Performance [24] Managing requirement changes [18] Performance [43] Communication [20] Communication [22] Communication [19] Communication [44] Requirement analysis [41] Managing requirement changes [11] Conflict resolution [1] Decision making [45] Decision making and conflict resolution [36] Decision making [46] Decision making [47] Performance [33] Decision Making [15] Performance [2] Conflict resolution [38] Decision-making [48] Decision-making [49] Performance and Decision making [13] Performance [14] Performance [8] Decision-making and performance [21] Communication [50] Decision-making VI. RESEARCH FINDINGS During searching and data extraction from the selected papers, many challenges were identified in software requirements negotiation.…”
Requirements negotiation involves discussion on the requirements conflict to have some compromise that will satisfy the participating stakeholders of a software project. The output of a requirement negotiation is a set of satisfied requirements of two or more parties. In this paper, we present a systematic review of requirements negotiation challenges. The study adopted 34 papers from the final study selection process which were analyzed based on the requirements negotiation challenges they addressed. The identified challenges are decision-making, communication, performance, managing requirement changes, and conflict resolution. The output of the study indicates that decision-making is addressed by 33% of the studies reviewed, followed by the performance with 22%, conflict resolution with 19%, while 16% focus on stakeholders’ communication, and managing requirements changes has 10%.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.