2020
DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2020.1782568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Editing for the Improvement of Oilseed Crop Productivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 277 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This platform requires a Cas nuclease, which produces a double-stranded DNA break, and a single guide RNA (sgRNA), which includes a short user-defined sequence that guides the Cas nuclease to a highly specific chromosomal locus of choice immediately upstream of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). Due to the unlinked nature of the resulting edit and the introduced transgene, this technology allows for the rapid production of non-transgenic germplasm bearing mutations that are identical in nature to those achieved spontaneously or through conventional breeding approaches such as chemical mutagenesis ( Subedi et al, 2020a , b ). While the regulatory status of crop varieties derived from genome editing is still uncertain in some countries, many others, including the United States, have concluded that in the absence of foreign DNA they are not “GM,” and will therefore not be subjected to costly and burdensome regulatory processes ( Schmidt et al, 2020 ; Singer et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This platform requires a Cas nuclease, which produces a double-stranded DNA break, and a single guide RNA (sgRNA), which includes a short user-defined sequence that guides the Cas nuclease to a highly specific chromosomal locus of choice immediately upstream of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). Due to the unlinked nature of the resulting edit and the introduced transgene, this technology allows for the rapid production of non-transgenic germplasm bearing mutations that are identical in nature to those achieved spontaneously or through conventional breeding approaches such as chemical mutagenesis ( Subedi et al, 2020a , b ). While the regulatory status of crop varieties derived from genome editing is still uncertain in some countries, many others, including the United States, have concluded that in the absence of foreign DNA they are not “GM,” and will therefore not be subjected to costly and burdensome regulatory processes ( Schmidt et al, 2020 ; Singer et al, 2021a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the large‐scale interspecific hybridization has accumulated unique resources with rich genetic diversity and genomic structural variants (Song et al ., 1995 ; Udall et al ., 2005 ). However, this germplasm was created based on traditional breeding techniques that are often imprecise and long‐term processes (Subedi et al ., 2020 ), and their value in trait improvement and heterosis utilization will be improved and fully exploited with the assistance of omics analysis, genome‐wide selection, speed breeding, and gene editing technology. First, it is very important to comprehensively dissect the complex genomic structures and pangenome diversity across the Brassica species, which could help build a genome‐wide atlas for genome‐based improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, gene editing has become the most popular and promising technique for functional genomics, and it promises to revolutionize crop improvement by creating new non‐transgenic varieties in a fast, efficient, and technically simple way without the use of transgenes (Schenke and Cai, 2020 ; Shelake et al ., 2019 ; Songstad et al ., 2017 ; Subedi et al ., 2020 ). Gene editing makes it possible to generate targeted deletions, insertions, gene knockouts, and point mutations, to modulate gene expression by targeting transcription factors or epigenetic machinery to DNA, or to target and modify RNA (Broeders et al ., 2020 ).…”
Section: Challenges and Approaches For Further Exploring And Expanding The Rapeseed Gene Poolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the type of Cas9, Cas9 recognizes a PAM sequence that is different from NGG ( Leenay and Beisel, 2017 ). Since the introduction of CRISPR/Cas9 technology, genome editing research has been conducted in various organisms, such as plants, humans, and microalgae ( Jeon et al, 2017 ; Jaganathan et al, 2018 ; Subedi et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2020b ).…”
Section: Crispr/cas9 and Lipid Metabolic Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%