2022
DOI: 10.1177/08920206221084050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis leadership: Leading schools in a global pandemic

Abstract: The global Covid-19 outbreak has disrupted schooling worldwide. Remote and limited face-to-face school management during the pandemic brought to bear the numerous challenges facing schools and principals throughout the crisis, which, in turn, gave rise to changes in their leadership practices and roles. The professional literature needs conceptual and empirical frameworks concerning the challenges facing principals, their role perceptions, and their behaviors when coping with a health crisis such as the corona… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, caring for and supporting the needs of school stakeholders during the pandemic (Goswick et al , 2018); promoting collaboration among school stakeholders (LaRoe and Corrales, 2019); distributing duties and responsibilities (Harris and Jones, 2020) and using communication networks effectively enabled principals' to achieve crisis leadership (LaRoe and Corrales, 2019). These features are reminiscent of the directive described in the “pandemic crisis leadership guide” (Schechter et al , 2022). In addition, the findings revealed that the personality traits, leadership experiences and decision-making skills of the principals contributed to their success in crisis leadership (Bishop et al , 2015; Goswick et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Lastly, caring for and supporting the needs of school stakeholders during the pandemic (Goswick et al , 2018); promoting collaboration among school stakeholders (LaRoe and Corrales, 2019); distributing duties and responsibilities (Harris and Jones, 2020) and using communication networks effectively enabled principals' to achieve crisis leadership (LaRoe and Corrales, 2019). These features are reminiscent of the directive described in the “pandemic crisis leadership guide” (Schechter et al , 2022). In addition, the findings revealed that the personality traits, leadership experiences and decision-making skills of the principals contributed to their success in crisis leadership (Bishop et al , 2015; Goswick et al , 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the transitioning to the virtual environment has largely changed principals’ roles and leadership practices during the pandemic (Harris, 2020), many principals experienced a drop in their efficacy level in leadership in comparison to that prior to the pandemic (Westberry & Hornor, 2022). Further, collaborative action and effort became more critical in response to new challenges and crises (Schechter et al, 2022). Thus, the principal’s shifted perception of their self and collective efficacy beliefs might contribute to PCEs stronger association with compassion fatigue in comparison to PSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To lead during a pandemic, principals have to balance the preservation of the school's existing capabilities with the innovation/development needed to cope with the new challenges posed by the crisis. Preservation refers to utilizing concurrent capacities and known operating patterns “to maintain stability and familiarity in times of stressful change” ( Schechter et al., 2022 ). Innovation, improvement, and development refer to thinking beyond the normal courses of action, obtaining new information from external sources, and adopting novel approaches (Schechter et al, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%