2009
DOI: 10.1177/0894439309332302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crisis in a Networked World

Abstract: Crises and disasters have micro and macro social arrangements that differ from routine situations, as the field of disaster studies has described over its 100-year history. With increasingly pervasive information and communications technology and a changing political arena where terrorism is perceived as a major threat, the attention to crisis is high. Some of these new features of social life have created changes in disaster response that we are only beginning to understand. The University of Colorado is esta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) is most consistent with the Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics [46], models of "continuous opinion dynamics" [47], and the many models of coordination and consensus of autonomous agents [37,[48][49][50][51]. The discrete nature of this update rule is consistent with the fact that information is often issued at some frequency or can be obtained in discrete units from governmental, social, or technical sources [42,52].…”
Section: Model Constructsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) is most consistent with the Hegselmann-Krause model of opinion dynamics [46], models of "continuous opinion dynamics" [47], and the many models of coordination and consensus of autonomous agents [37,[48][49][50][51]. The discrete nature of this update rule is consistent with the fact that information is often issued at some frequency or can be obtained in discrete units from governmental, social, or technical sources [42,52].…”
Section: Model Constructsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In such circumstances, it is know that each individual culls information from a wide variety of digital, sensorimotor, and social sources [42] and must decide if and when to evacuate. We assume that each individual has a simple decision rule: if the individual believes that the disaster is sufficiently likely, then he or she will evacuate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because SNS enable users to interact, collaborate, and upload user-generated content in real time from devices with internet access, such as smartphones, the platforms can be of tremendous use during highly dynamic crisis situations (Mendoza et al, 2010). In addition, the real-time two-way communication and many-to-many information-broadcasting tools provided via SNS allow the public to actively participate during crisis events by browsing others' published information, posting, and leaving public comments (Palen et al, 2009). Thus, people who are not at the crisis scene can also make sense of those events by sharing, commenting, and accessing information posted in SNS (Blum et al, 2014).…”
Section: Twitter and Collective Sense-making In The Aftermath Of Crismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…researchers see SM as a direct way to provide information between the response organization and community members (Flynn and Bates, 2011;Appleby, 2013). The use of SM gives disaster-related organizations a unique way to connect individuals who may not be geographically impacted by the incident (Palen et al, 2009). By providing diverse avenues for communication, SM extends the reach of a disaster past its own community and creates more sources for information dissemination and collection.…”
Section: Social Media Usementioning
confidence: 99%