Criminalizing Sex Work Clients and Rushed Negotiations among Sex Workers Who Use Drugs in a Canadian Setting

Abstract

Previous research indicates that criminalization of sex work is associated with harms among sex workers. In 2013, the Vancouver Police Department changed their sex work policy to no longer target sex workers while continuing to target clients and third parties in an effort to increase safety of sex workers (similar to "end-demand sex work" approaches being adopted in a number of countries globally). We sought to investigate the trends and correlates of rushing negotiations with clients due to police presence among 359 sex workers who use drugs in Vancouver before and after the guideline change. Data were derived from three prospective cohort studies of people who use drugs in Vancouver between 2008 and 2014. We used sex-stratified multivariable generalized estimating equation models. The crude percentages of sex workers who use drugs reporting rushing client negotiations changed from 8.9% before the guideline change to 14.8% after the guideline change among 259 women, and from 8.6% to 7.1% among 100 men. In multivariable analyses, there was a significant increase in reports of rushing client negotiation after the guideline change among women (p=0.04). Other variables that were independently associated with increased odds of rushing client negotiation included: experiencing client-perpetrated violence (among both men and women) and non-heterosexual orientation (among women) (all p<0.05). These findings indicate that despite the policing guideline change, rushed client negotiation due to police presence appeared to have increased among our sample of female sex workers who use drugs. It was also associated with client-perpetrated violence and other marker of vulnerability. These findings lend further evidence that criminalizing the purchase of sexual services does not protect the health and safety of sex workers.Word Count: 273

Associations between sex work laws and sex workers’ health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies

“…We synthesised 4 studies that reported an effect estimate associated with a mandatory registration separately [79,81,89,90] but considered lawful and unlawful repressive police activities within the regulatory system as part of the pooled analysis [63,72,91]. Three studies presented effect estimates associated with a policy change, STIs, and rushing negotiation with clients, and were also considered separately [57,77,92]. Twenty studies reported on outcomes relating to HIV/STI prevalence, violence, and condom use, on which our primary meta-analyses are based.…”

Strategies and Challenges in Preventing Violence Against Canadian Indoor Sex Workers

“…[18][19][20] Emerging research estimates that the prevalence of violence among indoor workers is between 25% and 66%. 1,12,21 Robbery, nonpayment, physical and sexual assault, deceptive condom removal, and exploitation by landlords and police are among the most common forms of violence in indoor settings. 1,12,21 These violent acts are enabled by the absence of legal and public health recognition and protections.…”

“…1,12,21 Robbery, nonpayment, physical and sexual assault, deceptive condom removal, and exploitation by landlords and police are among the most common forms of violence in indoor settings. 1,12,21 These violent acts are enabled by the absence of legal and public health recognition and protections. 2,7,11 There is an urgent need for public health programming that addresses workplace violence within indoor working environments and that considers the occupational health and safety of those involved.…”

Not collateral damage: Trends in violence and hate crimes experienced by sex workers in the Republic of Ireland

“…This increases sex workers' precarity because they are pushed to work in riskier conditions and are less able to enact screening and other safety strategies (e.g. rushed negotiations on street) (Landsberg et al, 2017). For indoor workers who previously would not go to buyers' homes or other outcall locations, they are now under increased pressure to do so to avoid detection by the police or eviction from their own homes (Amnesty International, 2016).…”