2010
DOI: 10.1057/9780230283114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criminal Defence and Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. A recent comparative book presents a dynamic ('law-in-action') ethnography of criminal defense in three states (Scheffer, Hannken-Illjes & Kozin 2010). Research on the assertion of state and class power in law and the criminal court cases dates back to the 1980s (McBarnet, 1981) despite repeated calls for such studies (Abel 1980;Banakar & Travers, 2005;Banakar, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3. A recent comparative book presents a dynamic ('law-in-action') ethnography of criminal defense in three states (Scheffer, Hannken-Illjes & Kozin 2010). Research on the assertion of state and class power in law and the criminal court cases dates back to the 1980s (McBarnet, 1981) despite repeated calls for such studies (Abel 1980;Banakar & Travers, 2005;Banakar, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sociology of professions and sociology of law have generated only modest knowledge about lawyers and their civic or political engagements, not to mention anti-state discourses or stands (but see Shapiro, 2002). In the sociology of law (Banakar & Travers, 2005;Banakar, 2009), the scant British, Scandinavian and US research on lawyers has paid much empirical attention to the least prestigious and worst paid end of the profession-criminal lawyers-and their relationship to their clients (for exceptions, see Dezalay & Garth, 2010;Lange, 2005;Pierce, 1995Pierce, , 2012Paterson & Teubner, 2005;Scheffer, Hannken-Illjes & Kozin, 2010;Shapiro, 2002) (see endnote 3).…”
Section: Civic and Politicized Lawyeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this 'initial immersion' in the field (Blanck 1987: 343), we were mainly seeking their cooperation. 'Access', however, turned out to be a much more complex issue than we envisioned (Scheffer et al 2010). Our visits soon revealed that not only would we need to convince the judges, but we would also have to play along with the unforeseen yet quite seminal authority of court clerks if we wanted to have access to files.…”
Section: Why Should We Mind the Gap? Reflections On The Relevance Of ...mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Beyond that, however, it is also significant that some criminal proceedings essentially take place in writing. In fact, if no jury is used for criminal trials, trials in common-law jurisdictions largely depend on previously established paperwork, that is, the documentation made and included by police officials, prosecutors, and lawyers in the case file (Scheffer, 2006(Scheffer, , 2007(Scheffer, , 2010Scheffer et al, 2010;Suresh, 2019). This paperwork approach is even more important in non-adversarial, inquisitorial civil law systems: the prosecutor-with the help of the police-is held to conduct an extensive pre-trial investigation to seek both incriminating and exculpatory evidence.…”
Section: Case Files As a Site Of Storytellingmentioning
confidence: 99%