Criconemoides xenoplax Experimentally Associated with a Disease of Peach

Lownsbery, B. F.

doi:10.1094/phyto-63-994

Cited by 25 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Associated with sugarcane (Rossi et al, 1996), cocoa (Sharma & Loof, 1974) and fig (Campos, 1997). Loof, 1965 Associated with peach tree short life syndrome (Lownsbery et al, 1973;Nesmith et al, 1981;Nyczepir et al, 1983).…”

Section: Macroposthonia Onoensis (Luc 1959) De Grissementioning

confidence: 99%

Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.

show abstract

Section: Macroposthonia Onoensis (Luc 1959) De Grissementioning

confidence: 99%

Plant‐parasitic nematodes of potential phytosanitary importance, their main hosts and reported yield losses

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Subsequent studies in both Canada and the United States implicated nematodes in the etiology of serious virus diseases such as tomato ring spot and peach yellow bud mosaic (Mai & Abawi 1981), crown gall (Dhanvantari et al 1975), bacterial and cytospora canker (Lownsbery et al 1973, Zehr et al 1982) and cold or drought stress (Nesmith & Dowler 1975).…”

Section: Nonspecific Replant Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Etiology and control of orchard replant problems: a review

Traquair

1984

Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Johnson et al (1978) from Ontario attributed significant growth reduction of Siberian C rootstock seedlings to infection by Pratylenchus penetrans. Lownsbery (1959) and Lownsbery et al (1968Lownsbery et al ( , 1973 attested that the growth reduction was the principal effect of the nematode infestation. Hung and Jenkins (1969) concluded from their greenhouse and laboratory experiments that the feeding by Macroposthonia curvatum Loof de Grisse on peach caused extensive lesions and pits on roots, which were later affected by other factors contributing to low vigor of the root system, finally resulting in the decline symptoms.…”

Section: Symptomologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Abiko and Kitajima (1970) established, on the basis of inoculation tests, that the blister canker fungus (Physalospora persicae) was specifically pathogenic only to peach. By using inoculation with Macroposthonia xenoplax as a routine procedure, Lownsbery et al (1973) reported reduced growth of 'Carolyn' peach on Love11 rootstock as well as increased susceptibility to both Pseudomonas syringae and "wet-feet." The full effect of the nematode was evident after only three growing seasons.…”

Section: Inoculationmentioning

confidence: 99%