The potential phytosanitary importance of all named plant‐parasitic nematode species was determined by evaluating available information on species characteristics, association with economically‐important crop hosts, and ability to act as vectors of viruses or form disease complexes with other pathogens. Most named species of plant‐parasitic nematodes (PPN) are poorly known, recorded from a single location only, not associated with economically‐important crops, and not known to be associated with other plant disease organisms. However, 250 species from 43 genera fulfilled one or more of the criteria to be considered to present a phytosanitary risk. The genera and number of species (in parentheses) considered as posing phytosanitary risk included: Achlysiella (1), Anguina (8), Aphasmatylenchus (1), Aphelenchoides (12), Aphelenchus (1), Belonolaimus (2), Bitylenchus (3), Bursaphelenchus (4), Cactodera (3), Ditylenchus (8), Dolichodorus (1), Globodera (3), Helicotylenchus (7), Hemicriconemoides (3), Hemicycliophora (3), Heterodera (25), Hirschmanniella (5), Hoplolaimus (5), Ibipora (3), Longidorus (10), Macroposthonia (2), Meloidogyne (38), Merlinius (3), Nacobbus (1), Neodolichodorus (2), Paralongidorus (2), Paratrichodorus (11), Paratylenchus (3), Pratylenchus (24), Punctodera (3), Quinisulcius (3), Radopholus (5), Rotylenchulus (3), Rotylenchus (1), Scutellonema (5), Sphaeronema (1), Subanguina (3), Trichodorus (5), Tylenchorhynchus (8), Tylenchulus (2), Vittatidera (1), Xiphinema (15) and Zygotylenchus (1). For each of the 250 species main hosts and yield loss estimates are provided with an extensive bibliography. Of the 250 species, only 126 species from 33 genera are currently listed as regulated pests in one or more countries worldwide. Almost all of these 250 species were also associated with economically important crops and some also acted as vectors for viruses.
We provide the first account of the effects of forest disturbance on species richness of nematodes in tropical forest soils, from 24 sites along gradients of disturbance and regeneration in the Mbalmayo Forest Reserve, Cameroon. Species richness was very high. Samples of 200 nematodes from individual soil cores contained a maximum of 89 and an average of 61 species; in total we recorded 431 species and approximately 194 genera. The model of Siemann et al. (1996), predicting that species richness scales as the number of individuals I , underestimates nematode diversity 4-6 fold in these samples. Over 90% of specimens cannot be assigned to known species. Although nematode species richness declined with forest disturbance, statistically significant effects were detectable only under the most extreme conditions (active slash-and-burn agriculture and complete mechanical forest clearance) and even here remained at 40% of the richness of near primary sites. Impacts on trophic structure were also small, and there were no significant changes in the maturity index (MI) (Bongers 1990) with disturbance (mean MI across all treatments was very high, at 3.58). In the light of this study, the problems of completing reliable all-taxon inventories in tropical forests are briefly discussed.
A classification of the entire Phylum Nematoda is presented, based on current molecular, developmental and morphological evidence. The classification reflects the evolutionary relationships within the phylum, as well as significant areas of uncertainty, particularly related to the early evolution of nematodes. It includes 3 classes, 8 subclasses, 12 superorders, 32 orders, 53 suborders, 101 superfamilies, 276 families, 511 subfamilies, 3030 genera, and 28537 species. All valid species named from the time of publication of the previous classification and census (2010) to the end of 2019 are listed, along with the number of valid species in each genus. Taxonomic authorities are provided for taxon names of all ranks. The habitats where the species in each genus are found are listed, and an alphabetic index of genus names is provided. The systematics of nematodes is reviewed, along with a history of nematode classification; evolutionary affinities and origins of nematodes; and the current diagnosis of the group. Short overviews of the general biology, ecology, scientific and economic importance of the group are presented.
The meiofauna from 14 sampling sites around the Hunter River estuary is described, and the factors influencing total density and relative abundance of nematodes and copepods and some species distributions are discussed. Elevation above low tide mark influenced nematode density, and salinity influenced copepod density and relative abundance. Both nematodes and copepods were most dense near the mud surface, and algal food and the depth of the reducing layer appear to be partially responsible for major differences in the density of these two taxa at different sites. Pollution also influenced the total density of both nematodes and copepods and also the relative abundance of oligochaetes: these relationships are discussed in the light of other, contradictory, reports. MethodsAt each of the 14 sampling sites, six replicate cores of mud were taken with a Perspex tube, sharpened to give a cutting edge, enclosing an area of 4 9 cm2 and sampling to a depth of 6 cm. One sample was used for granulometric analysis, the remainder for the extraction of the meiofauna. Additional quantitative samples were taken to only 1 cm depth at sites 13 and 14, and non-quantitative samples of algae from the mud surface and pneumatophores were also taken from sites 3, 4 and 8 for separate examination. All the samples were taken at low tide between 18 and 20 December 1981 and immediately immersed in 5% (v/v) formalin in screw-capped plastic containers.The fauna was extracted by a combination of sedimentation, sieving and centrifugation. The sample was stirred vigorously in a large volume of tap water and then passed through a 2-mm mesh sieve to remove large particles. The filtrate was stirred vigorously, then allowed to settle for 1 min in a 1-litre measuring cylinder (to remove sand grains), then passed through a 50-pm mesh sieve to collect the meiofauna together with other fine particulate material. This was repeated with 40 and 20 s settling time. The residue was washed from the filter and the meiofauna further separated by centrifugal flotation.
This chapter is an attempt to bring together the studies of nematode diversity in terrestrial, freshwater aquatic and marine environments, and to synthesize these into some sort of general hypotheses. Such hypotheses can then be used as the bases for a range of other scientific activities, including biomonitoring and hypothesis testing. The effects of many of the variables in studies of nematode diversity, such as methods used, resolution or scope of studies, and measures of diversity are discussed first. With this background, studies on nematode diversity are then summarized and compared at a general level. Finally, hypotheses of the general patterns and processes of nematode diversity are discussed. These general patterns form the natural background for biomonitoring: to evaluate any effect of an environmental change one must know the situation expected without the change, including the expected magnitude and direction of the effects of environmental change.
Theoretically, there are three principal ways in which ecosystem processes might respond to reductions in species richness. These theories are reviewed, and then considered in the context of a study of the diversity of soil nematodes and termites in near-primary forest sites at Mbalmayo, Cameroon, and the contribution made by these two taxa to carbon fluxes (CO2 and CH4) from the forest floor. Nematode abundances average 2.04 × 106 m -z, and termites between 2933 and 6957 m -2. The site is the most species-rich yet investigated for both groups anywhere in the world, so that a very large number of species contribute to carbon fluxes. We speculate about how much 'redundancy' might be built into the functioning of both assemblages, and point out the enormous difficulties of resolving such questions, and of producing such detailed species-inventories.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.