“…However, I would suggest that my research, on which their typology rests, is both misrepresented in the article and is also more central than simply a starting point for their work. Furthermore, a critique of the field as it presently stands should be comprehensive and thus cite existing works, such as Lanfranchi and Taylor (2001), Pearton (2000a, 2000b), Maguire and Stead (1998), McGovern (2000, 2002, and Stead and Maguire (1998a, 1998b. As such, this article is a response to their work and the critique they offer.…”