2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporary skilled international migration of young professional cricketers: ‘Going Down-Under’ to move-up the career path

Abstract: Recent theories of temporary skilled international migration tend to be predicated on intra-company overseas transfers and secondments. In this paper we present original findings from a study of cricket migrants to highlight another important form of temporary international movements that enable upskilling from strategic, channelled placements into a foreign club, to propel the careers of young professionals on return migration to their respective home club. Drawing upon interviews with 35 early-career English… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The migration industry is not constrained only to facilitating clandestine migration (Casas-Cortes et al, 2015;van Liempt, 2018) or regulated labour mobility (Goh et al, 2017;Wee et al, 2019), although these are some of the most intense terrains of migration intermediation. Migration industry actors also facilitate and condition mobility associated with international education (Basford and van Riemsdijk, 2017;Beech, 2018), sports people (Waite and Smith, 2017), the super-rich (Koh and Wissink, 2018), expatriates (Cranston, 2018) and return migration (Cohen, 2020). While such forms of mobility and migration are vastly different in their patterns, participation and experiences, they are part of a wider commercialisation of international migration (McCollum and Findlay, 2018).…”
Section: Migration Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The migration industry is not constrained only to facilitating clandestine migration (Casas-Cortes et al, 2015;van Liempt, 2018) or regulated labour mobility (Goh et al, 2017;Wee et al, 2019), although these are some of the most intense terrains of migration intermediation. Migration industry actors also facilitate and condition mobility associated with international education (Basford and van Riemsdijk, 2017;Beech, 2018), sports people (Waite and Smith, 2017), the super-rich (Koh and Wissink, 2018), expatriates (Cranston, 2018) and return migration (Cohen, 2020). While such forms of mobility and migration are vastly different in their patterns, participation and experiences, they are part of a wider commercialisation of international migration (McCollum and Findlay, 2018).…”
Section: Migration Industriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually measures that promote development in open economies tend to be associated with higher emigration (Lanati and Thiele 2018). Waite and Smith (2017) characterized the positive 'win-win-win' outcomes of international migration for the individual migrant and organisations in places of origin and destination. This includes the mutual shar-ing and learning of good practices to enhance the working processes, cultures and performances.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note the significance of electronic forms of communication that are being used by employers to manage and regulate migration whilst players are overseas (Dekker and Engbersen 2014). This, in itself, reflects wider changes associated with globalizing processes, with technological improvements enabling this contact (Thulin and Vilhelmson 2014) and increased control. However, it demonstrates that despite the assertion that technological change would negate the need for migration, physical relocation is still necessary for these migrants, but the nature of the migration has evolved to embrace technological and occupational change.…”
Section: Continued International Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%