DOI: 10.11606/d.18.2006.tde-22022007-204758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criação de conhecimento e inovação na indústria de alta tecnologia: estudo e análise de casos em uma empresa do setor de automação industrial

Abstract: STEFANOVITZ, J.P.(2006). Knowledge creation and innovation in the high-tech industry: cases study and analysis in a company of the industrial automation sector. 195p. M.Sc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides this typology, this research is classified as: a unique case, because it deals with a single project planning and execution; exploratory rather than conclusive, as it seeks to better define a problem and proposes considerations to reach a solution; qualitative, because it portrays real data in a descriptive way and the treatment of this data is directly related to the researcher’s ability to analyze the project environment and the available information (Stefanovitz, 2006); longitudinal, since it investigates data from the present moment (Miguel, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides this typology, this research is classified as: a unique case, because it deals with a single project planning and execution; exploratory rather than conclusive, as it seeks to better define a problem and proposes considerations to reach a solution; qualitative, because it portrays real data in a descriptive way and the treatment of this data is directly related to the researcher’s ability to analyze the project environment and the available information (Stefanovitz, 2006); longitudinal, since it investigates data from the present moment (Miguel, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of knowledge sharing by tacit means ("face to face" interactions) was reaffirmed by Stefanovitz [96] when dealing with innovation in product development processes.…”
Section: Key Points Relating To Tk Referencesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Communities of practices (CoP) [100,108] Competitive advantage [99] Crucial [54,65] Difficulty relating to TKS [12,88,[110][111][112] Firms value [81,106] Indicator to TKS [12,68,113] Individual property [27,90] Informality [3,51,67,89] Innovation [13,86,87,[101][102][103][104][105] Interactive action, socialization [19,48,51,84,96,114] Learning [37,[82][83][84]88] Management practices [95] Motivation [98] Organization intelligence [107] Organizational deterioration, performance [67,97] Organizational wisdom [36,90] Other words to TKS …”
Section: Key Points Relating To Tks Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models aim at proposing a set of activities (practices) that, when worked together, contribute to the correct and efficient knowledge management in companies (Cavalcante, 2011;Souza & Kurtz, 2014). Among these models of knowledge management, it can be highlighted some as Chaves & Veronese (2014), Garvin (1993), Davenport and Prusak (1998), Terra (2000), Teixeira Filho (2001), Pereira (2002), Batista (2004), Batista et al (2005), Dalkir (2005), Stefanovitz (2006), Leuch (2006), Helmann (2007), Takeuchi and Nonaka (2008), Purcidonio (2008). Batista (2004) characterizes practices of knowledge management as actions aiming at sharing storage, transference, dissemination and application of knowledge.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%