Crestal Bone Level Alterations in Implant Therapy

Koutouzis, Theofilos

doi:10.5772/16477

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 129 publications

(98 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Crestal bone loss showed statistically signi cant more bone loss from 0-6 months than from 6-12 months in the two groups statistically signi cant bone loss was observed in the control group than in the interventional group which is inconsistent with (24)Showed that implants placed in post-extraction sockets augmented with DFDBA exhibited minimal marginal bone loss similar to implants placed in native bone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…Our results are in contrast to (25) reported that No matter using autogenous tooth bone or xenogenous bone, the horizontal bone loss at the rst or the latter 6 months was almost the same in the level 0 mm, 3mm and 6mm of the implant facial part and No matter what the follow-up period is, and bone graft material used, the horizontal bone loss at the level of 6mm was much less than the level of 0mm and 3mm in the facial of the implant. All implants achieved the success criteria without (24) claiming that grafting of extraction sockets is bene cial in terms of limiting the dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge following tooth/teeth extraction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Shoeib

hamada

Abdelrahman

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: When restoring teeth in the aesthetic zone, soft tissue aesthetics for an immediate implant is considered challenging. This study aimed to evaluate soft tissue aesthetics around immediate dental implants with dentin chips and xenograft in thin buccal bone. Methodology: 16 patients with non-restorable teeth were recruited in this study for immediate implant placement with augmentation. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; dentin chips group with immediate implant and xenograft group with immediate implant also. Pink aesthetic scores are recorded on loading at 6 months & after 1 year of implant insertion according to Vanlıoğlu. Also, buccal bone and crestal bone resorption were measured using CBCT at 6 months & 1 year; implant stability was measured using osstel immediately on implant insertion & before loading, and pain is recorded as a Numerical rating scale according to Breivik. Results: In the present study, both groups showed better PES after 6 months and 1 year P-value = 0.343; P-value = 0.199 ; nearly same level of crestal bone & buccal bone at 6 months & 1 year P-value = 0.031; P-value = 0.029 P-value = 0.546; P-value = 0.268 ; implant stability is better at 6 months and one year P-value = 0.514; P-value = 0.340 and reduction in the post-operative pain within 1 week following implant placement with but with statistically significant difference within each group and also between both groups. Conclusions: The use of autogenous dentin chips proved to be a valid alternative to bone grafting materials to fill the jumping gap in conjunction with immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. PES, the overall difference between the control and the intervention groups showed no statistical significance.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Soft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Shoeib

hamada

Abdelrahman

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our results is in contrast to (25) reported that No matter using autogenous tooth bone or xenogenous bone, the horizontal bone loss at the rst or the latter 6 months was almost the same in the level 0 mm, 3mm and 6mm of the implant facial part and No matter what the follow-up period is, and bone graft material used, the horizontal bone loss at the level of 6mm was much less than the level of 0mm and 3mm in the facial of the implant. All implants achieved the success criteria without (24) claimed that grafting of extraction sockets is bene cial in terms of limiting the dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge following tooth/teeth extraction.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Soft Tissue Aesthetic using Pink aesthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Shoeib

Abdelrahman

hamada

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: To evaluate soft tissue aesthetics around immediate dental implants with dentin chips and xenograft in thin buccal bone . Methodology: 16 patients with non-restorable tooth were recruited in this study for immediate implant placement with augmentation . Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups; dentin chips group with immediate implant and xenograft group with immediate implant also. Pink aesthetic score are recorded on loading at 6 months & after 1 year of implant insertion according to Vanlıoğlu . Also buccal bone , crestal bone resorption were measured using CBCT on 6 month & 1 year ; implant stability were measured using osstel immediately on implant insertion & before loading and pain is recorded as Numerical rating scale according to Breivik . Results: In the present study, both groups showed better PES after 6 months and 1 year P-value = 0.343; P-value = 0.199 nearly same level of crestal bone & buccal bone at 6 months & 1 year P-value = 0.031; P-value = 0.029 P-value = 0.546; P-value = 0.268 implant stability is better at 6 months and one year P-value = 0.514; P-value = 0.340 and reduction in the post-operative pain within 1 week following implant placement with but with statistically significant difference within each group and also between both groups. Conclusions: The use of autogenous dentin chips proved to be a valid alternative to bone grafting materials to fill the jumping gap in conjunction with immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. PES, the overall difference between the control and the intervention groups showed no statistical significance

show abstract

“…Importantly, PIMBL is a multifactorial issue; it depends on surgical technique single vs. two-stage surgery, the loading time, and the grafted socket. In addition to the implant, tooth to implant distance, implant to abutment interface, which can be either supra-or subcrestal placement of the implant [ 22 ]. In the literature, this subject has been investigated extensively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of hypothyrodism’s medication (T4) on implant osstointegration: A case series and literature search

Al-Hindi

Alfotawi

Altamimi

et al. 2021

International Journal of Surgery Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Crestal Bone Level Alterations in Implant Therapy

Cited by 7 publications

References 129 publications

Soft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Soft Tissue Esthetic using Pink esthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Soft Tissue Aesthetic using Pink aesthetic score with Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation versus Conventional Immediate Implantation with Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone: (Randomized Controlled clinical trial)

Effect of hypothyrodism’s medication (T4) on implant osstointegration: A case series and literature search

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About