1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00543885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creep behaviour of hot isostatically pressed niobium alloy powder compacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 7 C there are two sets of data for the solid solution alloy Nb-5.4Hf-2Ti [ 113 ], which, as indicated in the caption, correspond to two different activation energies in έ = A(σ/E) n exp(−Q/RT), where E is the Young’s modulus [ 114 ]. The higher activation energy is closer to the activation energy for the diffusion of Hf in Nb [ 6 ].…”
Section: Objectives Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 7 C there are two sets of data for the solid solution alloy Nb-5.4Hf-2Ti [ 113 ], which, as indicated in the caption, correspond to two different activation energies in έ = A(σ/E) n exp(−Q/RT), where E is the Young’s modulus [ 114 ]. The higher activation energy is closer to the activation energy for the diffusion of Hf in Nb [ 6 ].…”
Section: Objectives Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1982, Wadsworth et al [21] fabricated a commercial C103 niobium alloy (Ni + 10 wt.% Hf + 1 wt.% Ti) by duplex hipping process for high-performance missile and space application systems. The microstructure of the fabricated metal had an average grain size of 75 μm.…”
Section: Coarse-grained Superplasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Superplastic behaviors of the HC‐LRMEA samples. a) engineering stress‐strain curves obtained under tensile loading at temperatures of 973, 1073, and 1173 K and strain rates of 10 −3 and 10 −2 s −1 ; b) images of representative specimens fractured under temperatures of 973, 1073, and 1173 K and a strain rate of 10 −2 s −1 ; c) stress–strain, σ–ε , curves and strain‐rate sensitivity ( m ) values obtained from strain‐rate jump tests conducted at 1173 K with 4 different strain rates of 5 × 10 −4 , 1 × 10 −3 , 5 × 10 −3 , and 1 × 10 −2 s −1 , where n = 1/ m is the stress exponent; d) the hardness distribution of the sample after coarse‐grained superplastic deformation; the inset in (d) illustrates the hardness test and morphology of hardness indentation; e) yield strength versus superplastic elongation at high strain rates (10 −2 s −1 ) of coarse‐grained superplastic magnesium alloys, [ 25 , 26 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ] coarse‐grained superplastic aluminum alloys, [ 28 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ] coarse‐grained niobium alloy, [ 73 ] coarse‐grained superplastic intermetallics, [ 74 , 75 , 76 ] and coarse‐grained superplastic titanium alloys. [ 9 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By converting this hardness to the strength, a formula of HV ≈3 σ y [ 55 ] is used to characterize the strength, which indicates that the strength of HC‐LRMEA is still higher than 1 GPa after superplastic deformation (Figure 2d ). In addition, HC‐LRMEA is compared with other coarse‐grained superplastic alloys, including coarse‐grained superplastic magnesium alloys, [ 26 , 27 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ] coarse‐grained superplastic aluminum alloys, [ 29 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 ] coarse‐grained niobium alloy, [ 71 ] coarse‐grained superplastic intermetallics, [ 72 , 73 , 74 ] and coarse‐grained superplastic titanium alloys, [ 9 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 ] Superplastic elongation at high strain rates (≥10 −2 s −1 ) versus strength is plotted in Figure 2e . The strength values of the coarse‐grained superplastic magnesium and aluminum alloys are relatively low, making them difficult to use in some high‐strength conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%