2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00055.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit Union to Mutual Conversion: Do Interest Rates Diverge?

Abstract: "This study conducts a cross-sectional analysis of 175 depository institutions, assessing the impact on the interest rates charged on loan products and offered on savings products by the size of the institution, its liquidity, its net worth, its tax and salary payments, and its status as a for-profit institution, a credit union (CU), or a converted CU. We find that banks and converted CUs have interest rates significantly less favorable for consumers than CUs, suggesting that a CU converting will result in adv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential sophistication of financial services on offer to members depends on country specific regulation and legislation. For example, in the United States, Canada and Australia, credit union regulation is similar to that of banks and hence some credit unions in these countries have grown into large bank-like organisations or have converted to banks (Heinrich and Kashian 2008;Davis 2007). In other countries such as Great Britain, Poland, Romania, Macedonia and NI, national legislation restricts the products that credit unions can offer, such as rules on loan size amounts and durations (McKillop et al 2010) and credit unions have remained community, member-governed, NP, financial organisations.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential sophistication of financial services on offer to members depends on country specific regulation and legislation. For example, in the United States, Canada and Australia, credit union regulation is similar to that of banks and hence some credit unions in these countries have grown into large bank-like organisations or have converted to banks (Heinrich and Kashian 2008;Davis 2007). In other countries such as Great Britain, Poland, Romania, Macedonia and NI, national legislation restricts the products that credit unions can offer, such as rules on loan size amounts and durations (McKillop et al 2010) and credit unions have remained community, member-governed, NP, financial organisations.…”
Section: Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in this analysis we are only investigating the savings to credit union members from auto loans, which make up roughly one‐third of credit union loan portfolios. However, evidence suggests that credit union members also benefit from lower rates on mortgages and unsecured loans, as well as higher rates on deposits (e.g., DeYoung et al, 2019; Feinberg & Ataur Rahman, 2006; Feinberg & Meade, 2017; Heinrich & Kashian, 2008; Tokle & Tokle, 2000). We also find a pattern of lower credit union loan rates in the SCF data across a variety of loan products, as well as higher deposit rates.…”
Section: Testing Alternative Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 For example: Andreoni (1989); Ashraf and Bandiera (2017); Besley and Ghatak (2017); Moore (1996, 1998); Hedblom et al (2019); Van Rijn and Li (2019). 33 For example: DeYoung et al (2019); Feinberg and Meade (2017); Heinrich and Kashian (2008); Tokle and Tokle (2000). 34 For more background information on credit union fields of membership, see van Rijn (2018).…”
Section: Prime Borrowers and Interest-rate Shoppersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit unions are less sensitive, in terms of loan default risk, than banks to macroeconomic shocks (Smith and Woodbury, 2010). Credit unions, by virtue of the diffuse nature of financial benefits and its representative governance structure, are exposed to reduced risk tendencies as compared to banks, thereby enabling credit unions to charge lower consumer loan rates (Becker, 2004;Heinrich and Kashian, 2008;Smith and Woodbury, 2010;Goddard et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ijbm 345mentioning
confidence: 99%