2019 18th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA (INFOTEH) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/infoteh.2019.8717766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Credit Card Fraud Detection - Machine Learning methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The extreme imbalance ratio of 577:1 is incomparable to any of the datasets in imblearn.datasets. Also, this dataset has received special attention of researchers attempting to use ML in Credit fraud detection (Varmedja et al 2019). In this article we see that lr and rf have good prediction accuracies on the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extreme imbalance ratio of 577:1 is incomparable to any of the datasets in imblearn.datasets. Also, this dataset has received special attention of researchers attempting to use ML in Credit fraud detection (Varmedja et al 2019). In this article we see that lr and rf have good prediction accuracies on the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Thus we chose these two ML models for the credit fraud dataset. Varmedja et al (2019) has also not provided cross validated analysis of their models, while our models have been trained and tested with the usual tenfold cross validation framework as discussed before. Also, for two small datasets with a critically small minority class, we used only knn and lr classifiers, with parameter settings as specified before.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unsupervised learning outperforms supervised methods when considering skewness [19]. However, oversampling methods like SMOTE have proven [41] to improve accuracy in supervised models. Lastly, recent research concludes that combining multiple outlier scores can negatively impact accuracy [30].…”
Section: ) Unsupervised Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em [Varmedja et al 2019] também foi utilizado o mesmo conjunto de dados. Foi aplicada a técnica SMOTE para sobreamostragem e feita uma seleção de atributos para comparar os algoritmos de regressão logística, Naïve Bayes, random forest e multilayer perceptron.…”
Section: Trabalhos Correlatosunclassified
“…Por exemplo, em [Khatri et al 2020]é realizado um estudo comparativo de diferentes técnicas de aprendizado de máquina, porém sob o conjunto original desbalanceado. Já em [Sahin and Duman 2011], [Dhankhad et al 2018], [Mishra and Ghorpade 2018], [Niu et al 2019] e [Varmedja et al 2019], utiliza-se umaúnica técnica de balanceamento, enquanto que em [Awoyemi et al 2017]é utilizada uma combinação de duas técnicas.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified