Creativity in local government: Definition and determinants

Abstract

In current thinking about public service improvement, civil servant creativity plays an important role. Using the results of 43 semi‐structured interviews, we assessed the degree to which our theoretical knowledge about creativity—based primarily on business research—matches the insights of managers in local government. Respondents considered employee creativity to be important, but—in contrast to the literature—understood creativity as the act of trying out new things to better deal with specific problems at hand instead of developing new ideas potentially applicable to a wider context. As such, respondents did not see creativity as the main precondition for innovation. In line with the literature, there is little consistency across respondents about individual‐ and context‐level determinants of creativity. Lastly, respondents put forward several factors that have received little attention in the literature but are particularly relevant in understanding differences in work‐related creativity in the context of local government.

The Transaction Costs of Government Responses to the COVID‐19 Emergency in Latin America

“…This crisis has challenged municipalities to implement new solutions to respond to a novel problem. In this context, creativity understood as the implementation of modern manners to face specific issues (Kruyen and van Genugten 2017) seems to be an essential administrative and institutional capacity that provides more effective actions from local governments. At the same time, agile‐adaptive government can be a useful concept (Moon 2020) since municipalities confront enormous and wicked problems.…”

Building Effective, Accountable, and Inclusive Institutions in Europe and Central Asia

“…Such a climate is essential to an organization's ability to innovate and improve its productivity and performance, whether in the private or the public sector (Arundel et al, 2015). An organization's innovation climate is, to a great extent, dependent on management practices: it is based on whether the organization's strategy explicitly includes innovation as a goal, whether its structure is flexible and provides degrees of freedom to its staff, whether there is an innovation sup- (Kruyen & Van Genugten, 2017). These personal attributes could (a) be measured in the recruitment procedure of new public servants, and (b) lead to innovative work behavior once new employees are hired.…”

De griffier in gemeenteland

“…Er is in de (bestuurskundige) literatuur veel aandacht voor de mogelijke samenhang van deze factoren met organisatiegedrag, maar tegelijkertijd is er nog veel te ontdekken over hoe deze samenhang precies in elkaar steekt. Wat competenties betreft laten studies zien dat generieke vaardigheden ertoe doen, terwijl bevindingen tegelijkertijd inconsistent zijn (voor creativiteit is bijvoorbeeld zowel doorzetten als knopen doorhakken vereist; zie bijvoorbeeld Kruyen & Van Genugten, 2017). Kijken wij naar de mogelijke impact van kernwaarden en opvattingen over het eigen werk op gedrag in organisaties, dan verwijzen wij graag naar verschillende bestuurskundige studies (Hendriks & Drosterij, 2012;Van der Wal e.a., 2008;Moore, 1995) die vaststelden dat organisatiegedrag afhankelijk is van kernwaarden.…”