2005
DOI: 10.1080/14790720508668950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative Writing and an Overlooked Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers studied the writing process of students at the high school level, which included writing speed, thinking pauses, writing fluency and the time needed in the revision stage before the written product was declared complete. In addition, this study also assessed aspects of the final product of students' writing, including the number of words, complex clauses, and narrative structure (Beck, 2004;Blythe & Sweet, 2005;Brayfield, 2009). From this research, it was found that there is a significant correlation between the components of the writing speed process and the percentage of complex clauses with the quality of the final product of students' writing.…”
Section: Writing Using a Computermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Researchers studied the writing process of students at the high school level, which included writing speed, thinking pauses, writing fluency and the time needed in the revision stage before the written product was declared complete. In addition, this study also assessed aspects of the final product of students' writing, including the number of words, complex clauses, and narrative structure (Beck, 2004;Blythe & Sweet, 2005;Brayfield, 2009). From this research, it was found that there is a significant correlation between the components of the writing speed process and the percentage of complex clauses with the quality of the final product of students' writing.…”
Section: Writing Using a Computermentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Others however, insisted that without specific instruction focusing on criteria for task completion (e.g. forms or checklists for evaluating organization or style) peers would not be able to give more than superficial feedback, which was not regarded as supportive in improving their partners" texts (Beach 1989;Bishop, 1990;Gere & Abbott, 1985;Neubert & McNelis, 1990). Freedman (1985) concluded from a National survey on writing instruction with peer response that many teachers experience difficulties getting students to respond effectively to each other's writing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%