Creative-scientific decision-making skills learning model for training creative thinking skills and student decision making skills

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to produce a valid learning model by validating the creative-scientific decision -making skills (CSDMS) learning model to improve creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. 
 Design/Methodology/Approach: The research methodology is development research adapted from Borg and Gall which consists of three stages: the preliminary stage, the model design stage and the model testing stage. This research is conducted through validation study designs those tests two criteria, namely content and construct validity by involving three experts in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) activities. The validity criteria were determined based on the Aiken validation index. 
 Findings: The study’s findings show that the CSDMS model is valid in terms of content and construct. This is based on calculations using the Aiken formula which shows that the V value for each instrument item is 0.89 ≤ V ≤ 1 with a very valid category. It was concluded that the CSDMS model was stated to be valid both in terms of content and construct validity in order to improve students' creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. 
 Contribution to literature: This research produces a valid learning model in terms of content and construct, so that it can improve creative thinking skills and decision-making skills. The CSDMS model has a syntax consisting of six phases, namely: 1) Problem orientation 2) Exploration 3) Elaboration 4) Group investigation 5) Decision making and 6) Evaluation and reflection.

Validity of Science Literacy on the Respiratory System in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum

“…The feasibility of the scientific literacy test instrument can be measured from the results of validation by experts using a validation sheet. The validation sheet contains instructions and requests to the validator to provide suggestions for improvement and provide an assessment (Siagian et al, 2023). The validation sheet is equipped with a choice of scores 1-4 (Likert scale) with the numerical score categories as in Table 1.…”

Research on the relationship between collective teacher efficacy and teaching innovation as a mediator

“…Goddard, et al [17] applied the concept of collective efficacy to teachers' groups and considered that collective teacher efficacy refers to the perception and subjective judgment of school teachers on teachers' groups and that all teachers can organize and implement the action process needed to have a positive impact on students. Active allies often help teachers actively participate in innovation and development and provide resources for them [18,19]. After schools with high collective teacher efficacy set challenging goals, teachers usually make unremitting efforts to achieve these goals [20].…”

Developing a Project-Based Learning Course Model Combined with the Think–Pair–Share Strategy to Enhance Creative Thinking Skills in Education Students

“…Consequently, some may lack confidence in their ability to think creatively, restricting their ability to effectively integrate creative thinking into their classroom activities. Thus, student teachers could benefit from continuous professional development, training programs, workshops, mentoring, and guidance from experienced teachers to increase their creativity in designing and managing classroom activities [2,3].…”