1970
DOI: 10.2307/3191547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creative and Mental Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attributed status included level of education or profession (low level, i.e., garbage collector; no indication regarding level of profession; high level, i.e., teacher, doctor) and figure size defined by length and.width (measured in centimeters and categorized as small, medium, or large). Lowenfeld (1947) and Thomas, Chaigne, and Fox (1989) suggested the idea that for children, large figures represent important people and objects, and small figures represent inferior people and objects. To examine these suggestions, I asked children in Sample 2 to complete the following: "Children who draw a [large/small] person want to convey that...." Two judges who reviewed the answers identified important and strong as the most frequently used adjectives for a large figure.…”
Section: Scoring the Drawingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attributed status included level of education or profession (low level, i.e., garbage collector; no indication regarding level of profession; high level, i.e., teacher, doctor) and figure size defined by length and.width (measured in centimeters and categorized as small, medium, or large). Lowenfeld (1947) and Thomas, Chaigne, and Fox (1989) suggested the idea that for children, large figures represent important people and objects, and small figures represent inferior people and objects. To examine these suggestions, I asked children in Sample 2 to complete the following: "Children who draw a [large/small] person want to convey that...." Two judges who reviewed the answers identified important and strong as the most frequently used adjectives for a large figure.…”
Section: Scoring the Drawingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, we found that almost all included studies involved some or all participants aged 6–12 years old in their samples. According to major stages of artistic development (Lowenfeld & Brittain, 1982), children approximately 6–7 years old can make schematic drawings. Usually, children more than 12 years old move to the adolescent stage, which is very different from younger children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some research has explored the visual characteristics of student artwork, the issue is still not fully resolved. In the early 20th century, the study of student artwork focused mainly on visual data such as space, lines, and perspective abilities (Indicated, 1966;Laroche, 2015;Zurmuehien, 1970), without discussing other elements of their artwork (Victoria et al, 2016). In contrast, Loureiro et al used semiotics to analyze student artwork, but this would be more academic if the scope of research were broader (Loureiro et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Visual Characteristics Of Student Drawingsmentioning
confidence: 99%