2012
DOI: 10.1175/jcli-d-11-00022.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creation of a Heat and Salt Flux Dataset Associated with Sea Ice Production and Melting in the Sea of Okhotsk

Abstract: Sea ice formation, its transport, and its melting cause the redistribution of heat and salt, which plays an important role in the climate and biogeochemical systems. In the Sea of Okhotsk, a heat and salt flux dataset is created in which such sea ice processes are included, with a spatial resolution of ;12.5 km. The dataset is based on a heat budget analysis using ice concentration, thickness, and drift speed from satellite observations and the ECMWF Interim Re-Analysis (ERA-Interim) data. The salt flux calcul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that thin ice thickness of less than about 0.2 m can be estimated from the R. In situ measurements have shown that ice thickness in Antarctic coastal polynyas is generally less than about 0.2 m (Jeffries and Adolphs 1997;Tamura et al 2006). In this study, ice thickness of #0.2 m is estimated from polarization ratio (PR) of TBs, as in previous studies (Tamura et al 2007;Nihashi et al 2009;Iwamoto et al 2013Iwamoto et al , 2014. PR is defined by PR 5 (TB V 2 TB H )/(TB V 1 TB H ) and linearly transformed from R using the equation PR 5 (R 2 1)/(R 1 1).…”
Section: A Estimation Of Thin Ice Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…These results suggest that thin ice thickness of less than about 0.2 m can be estimated from the R. In situ measurements have shown that ice thickness in Antarctic coastal polynyas is generally less than about 0.2 m (Jeffries and Adolphs 1997;Tamura et al 2006). In this study, ice thickness of #0.2 m is estimated from polarization ratio (PR) of TBs, as in previous studies (Tamura et al 2007;Nihashi et al 2009;Iwamoto et al 2013Iwamoto et al , 2014. PR is defined by PR 5 (TB V 2 TB H )/(TB V 1 TB H ) and linearly transformed from R using the equation PR 5 (R 2 1)/(R 1 1).…”
Section: A Estimation Of Thin Ice Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…, which is somewhat smaller than the observed estimate of sea ice production rate of 6.5 3 10 11 m 3 yr 21 (Nihashi et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…To validate the simulated sea ice production, we used ice production estimated by a heat budget analysis using ice concentration, thickness, and drift speed from satellite observation, and Interim ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERAInterim) data (Nihashi et al 2012) (available from 2003 to 2009 with a spatial resolution of 12.5 km). In their study, ice production rate per unit area (V i ) in the Okhotsk coastal polynyas is calculated by V i 5 Q/r i L f , where Q is daily heat loss from the sea surface to the atmosphere, r i (5920 kg m…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations